Find the bounds after changing the variables in a double integral

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on changing the variable bounds in a double integral from xy to uv coordinates. The user initially calculates the integral with specific bounds but later realizes there may be an error in the bounds for v. After analyzing the graph of the triangle formed by the lines, they propose a new setup for the double integral that splits it into two parts based on the value of u. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying the bounds to ensure the integral yields the correct result. Ultimately, the user feels confident in their revised approach after receiving feedback.
Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
1616299276442.png

The answer calculates the integral with ##du## before ##dv## as shown below.
1616299342699.png

However I decided to compute it in the opposite order with different bounds. Here is my work:
According to the definitions, $$\begin{cases} u=x+y\\ v=2x-3y \end{cases}$$
First we need to convert the boundaries in xy into uv. The equation of y-axis is ##v=-3u## and the equation of x-axis is ##v=2u##. This two lines give the lower and upper limits of the inner integral dv. The bounds for u can be found by substituting ##x=0## and ##y=0## into ##2x-3y=4##. The lower bounds appears at the lower vertex of the triangle with the value of ##u=-4/3##. Similarly, the upper bounds is the right vertex at ##u=2##. After putting things together we get
$$\frac 1 5 \int _{-4/3}^{2}\int _{-3u}^{2u}v^2u^2\,dvdu$$
I'd like someone to check if the bounds in this integral are correct. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

If you did everything correctly, your integral would yield the same as what the alternative yields. I get a different result, though.

Draw some lines where ##u## is constant and check the bounds of ##v##

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
Hi,

If you did everything correctly, your integral would yield the same as what the alternative yields. I get a different result, though.

Draw some lines where ##u## is constant and check the bounds of ##v##
Thank you! I think I messed up the bounds for v.
123.jpg

The graph above shows that heights of the endpoints of the line segment spanning the height of the triangle at a fixed x value are ##v=4## and ##v=-3u## or ##v=2u##; the choice of the lower bound depends on x. Hence the double integral can be written as

$$\frac 1 5 \int _{-4/3}^{0}\int _{-3u}^{4}v^2u^2\,dvdu+\frac 1 5 \int _{0}^{2}\int _{2u}^{4}v^2u^2\,dvdu$$
Is this correct?
 
You can evaluate and check for yourself ...

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
You can evaluate and check for yourself ...

##\ ##
I think I got it right. I appreciate your help.
1616364743893.png
 
Looks ok. (didn't check it, but I see you have to do two integrals -- which is the reason the book solution prefers the other order)
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...