Find the equation of the tangent of the parabola y^2= 4px

  • Thread starter Thread starter callas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola Tangent
callas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello everyone,
:confused:i'm having can't seem to solve these two questions...

1) Find the equation of the tangent of the parabola y^2= 4px, perpendicular to the lines 4Y- X + 3=0, and find the point of contact?

2) Find the equation of the tangent to the parabola Y^2= 10x, at the extremities of the lactus rectum. On what line do these tangents intersect?

If there is anyone out there who knows the answer...could u please explain or direct me to a suitable site which may explain the concepts.:cry:


Thanks callas
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


1) Can you find the gradient of that line? It says to find the tangent parallel to that line so when you take the derivative of the parabola, you're going to have to make it equal to the gradient of the line to find the value(s) of the points on the parabola that are have this gradient.

2) Do you know how to find the equation of the latus rectum on a parabola? You'll have to again take the derivative of the parabola and then find what the gradients of the tangents are at the points where the latus rectum intersects the parabola. Since you'll know the it should be fairly simple to find the point of intersection between the tangent and the parabola, so you should be able to form an equation for each tangent. Now just find where these tangents intersect and notice the point's similarity to the focus and latus rectum.
 


thanks...but i can not use any calculus method...it must only be solved using analytic geometry...yes i could find the gradient...
 


callas said:
hello everyone,
:confused:i'm having can't seem to solve these two questions...

1) Find the equation of the tangent of the parabola y^2= 4px, perpendicular to the lines 4Y- X + 3=0, and find the point of contact?
Any line perpendicular to 4y- x+ 3= 0 must have slope -4 and is of the form y= -4x+ a or x= -(1/4)y+ b. That line will cross to y^2= 4px or x= (1/4p)y^2 where x= -(1/4)y+ b= y^2/4p and will be tangent if and only if that equation has a double root. That is equivalent to the quadratic equation y^2+ py- 4pb= 0 and has a double root if and only if the discriminant, p^2- 4(-4pb)= p^2+ 16pb= 0. Solve that for b.

2) Find the equation of the tangent to the parabola Y^2= 10x, at the extremities of the lactus rectum. On what line do these tangents intersect?
The "latus rectum" of this parabola is the vertical line segment, passing through the focus of the parabola with endpoints on the parabola. This particular parabola has focus at (2.5, 0) and its endpoints are where y^2= 10(2.5) or (2.5, -5) and (2.5, 5).
Any line passing through (2.5, -5) has the form x= m(y+5)+ 2.5. Again, use the fact that we must have a double root for x= (1/10)y^2= m(y+5)+ 2.5, which is equivalent to y^2- 10my+ 7= 0 to find m. Do the same with (2.5, 5).

If there is anyone out there who knows the answer...could u please explain or direct me to a suitable site which may explain the concepts.:cry:


Thanks callas
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top