Find the field of two infinite strips of width b

  • Context: Archived 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KeithPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Infinite Width
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field produced by two infinite charged strips with surface charge densities of ±σ and width b. Part a) successfully derives the electric field magnitude at a distance a from one strip, yielding the expression Eσ = -kσ ln((a+b)²/a²). Part b) addresses the force per unit height between the strips, concluding that it equals (σ²b ln(2))/(πε₀). The results confirm that the electric field diverges at the boundaries of the strips, but the force remains finite.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and forces in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and logarithmic functions
  • Knowledge of surface charge density and its implications
  • Basic principles of symmetry in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of force between charged objects in electrostatic equilibrium
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields at boundaries and their divergence
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in electrostatics and electric field calculations.

KeithPhysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
> Q:The two charged strips in the following picture have width b, infinite height,and negligible thickness(in the direction perpendicular to the page).Their densities per unit area are \pm \sigma .​

>a)Find the field magnitude produced due to one of the strips from a distance a away from it(in the plane of the page).​

>b)Show that the force(per unit height) between the two strips is equal to \frac{\sigma^2 b \ln(2)}{\pi \epsilon_0}. Note that this result is finite, even tough the field in the boundary of the strip diverges.​

>*Part a) solved in the following lines:

>**Struggling with part b)
N4nZ3.png
Attempted Solution:

>Part a) solved in the following lines:

As the figure shows I calculate the Field from a distance a from the first tape:

$$\begin{aligned}E_x&=\int\int \frac{k dq}{r^2}\cos{\theta} \\ &=k\int\int \frac{\sigma da}{r^2}\cos{\theta} \end{aligned}$$

From the geometry of the figure we get:

$$\begin{aligned}E_x&=k\sigma\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_0^b \frac{ dx dy}{(a+x)^2+y^2}\cdot\frac{a+x}{\sqrt{(a+x)^2+y^2}} \\ &=k\sigma\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big(\int_0^b \frac{ (a+x)dx }{\Big((a+x)^2+y^2\Big)^{3/2}}\Big)dy\end{aligned}$$If u= (a+x)^2+y^2=(a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2), thus du=(2a+2x)dx \Rightarrow du/2=(a+x)dx

$$\begin{aligned}E_x&=k\sigma\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( \int_{c'}^{d'} \frac{du}{2u^{3/2}} \Big)dy=\frac{k\sigma}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( \Big[ \frac{-2}{u^{1/2}}\Big]_{c'}^{d'} \Big)dy \\ &=-k\sigma \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( \Big[(a+x)^2+y^2)^{-1/2} \Big]_{0}^{b} \Big)dy \\ &=-k\sigma \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( (a+b)^2+y^2)^{-1/2} -(a^2+y^2)^{-1/2} \Big)dy \\ &=-k\sigma \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( \frac{1}{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+y^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{a^2+y^2}} \Big)dy \end{aligned} $$

We can find an anti-derivative for the previous expression:
$$\begin{aligned}E_x&=-k\sigma \Big[ \ln(\sqrt{(a+b)^2+y^2}+y)-\ln(\sqrt{a^2+y^2}+y)\Big]_{-\infty}^{\infty}\\ &=-k\sigma \lim_{d \rightarrow \infty} \Big[ \ln\Big(\frac{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+y^2}+y}{\sqrt{a^2+y^2}+y}\Big) \Big]_{-d}^{d} \\ &=-k\sigma \lim_{d \rightarrow \infty} \Big[ \ln\Big(\frac{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+d^2}+d}{\sqrt{a^2+d^2}+d}\Big) - \ln\Big(\frac{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+d^2}-d}{\sqrt{a^2+d^2}-d}\Big)\Big] \end{aligned} $$

The first limit can be easily seen as tending to 0 and the second one according to [Wolfram] https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=lim+d+->infinity++log((d-sqrt((c)^2+d^2))/(d-sqrt((f)^2+d^2))) tends to \ln(\frac{(a+b)^2}{a^2}) something that is rather convenient.

So the intensity of the field of the \sigma tape is equal to :

$$E_{\sigma}=-k\sigma \ln \Big(\frac{(a+b)^2}{a^2}\Big)$$

This result seems right because the field diverges in 0 and in -b .

Using a similar approach we can calculate the other plate field changing the limits of integration of x from b to 2b

$$\begin{aligned}E_x&=k\sigma\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big(\int_b^{2b} \frac{ (a+x)dx }{\Big((a+x)^2+y^2\Big)^{3/2}}\Big)dy \\ &=-k\sigma \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( \Big[(a+x)^2+y^2)^{-1/2} \Big]_b^{2b} \Big)dy \\ &=-k\sigma \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( (a+2b)^2+y^2)^{-1/2} -((a+b)^2+y^2)^{-1/2} \Big)dy \\ &=-k\sigma \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Big( \frac{1}{\sqrt{(a+2b)^2+y^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+y^2}} \Big)dy \end{aligned} $$

We can find an anti-derivative for the previous expression:
$$\begin{aligned}E_x&=-k\sigma \Big[ \ln(\sqrt{(a+2b)^2+y^2}+y)-\ln(\sqrt{(a+b)^2+y^2}+y)\Big]_{-\infty}^{\infty}\\ &=-k\sigma \lim_{d \rightarrow \infty} \Big[ \ln\Big(\frac{\sqrt{(a+2b)^2+y^2}+y}{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+y^2}+y}\Big) \Big]_{-d}^{d} \\ &=-k\sigma \lim_{d \rightarrow \infty} \Big[ \ln\Big(\frac{\sqrt{(a+2b)^2+d^2}+d}{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+d^2}+d}\Big) - \ln\Big(\frac{\sqrt{(a+2b)^2+d^2}-d}{\sqrt{(a+b)^2+d^2}-d}\Big)\Big] \end{aligned} $$

Again the first limit can be easily seen as tending to 0 and the second one according to [Wolfram] https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=lim+d+->infinity++log((d-sqrt((c)^2+d^2))/(d-sqrt((f)^2+d^2))) tends to \ln(\frac{(a+2b)^2}{(a+b)^2}) something that is again rather convenient.

So the intensity of the field of the -\sigma tape is equal to :

$$E_{-\sigma}=k\sigma \ln \Big(\frac{(a+2b)^2}{(a+b)^2}\Big)$$

This result seems right because the field diverges in -b and in -2b .

Now if I sum the two fields:

$$E_T=E_{-\sigma}+E_{-\sigma}=-k\sigma \ln \Big(\frac{(a+b)^2}{b^2}\Big) + k\sigma \ln \Big(\frac{(a+2b)^2}{(a+b)^2}\Big)$$
Reducing the last expression and using the properties of logarithms:
$$E_T=-2k\sigma \ln \Big(\frac{(a+b)}{b}\Big) + 2k\sigma \ln \Big(\frac{(a+2b)}{(a+b)}\Big)=-2k\sigma \ln \Big(\frac{a(a+2b)}{(a+b)^2}\Big)$$

It diverges when x=b.

I tried with polar coordinates and I arrived to the same solution but much easier.

>How can solve part b), I don't know how to do it.​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no need to sum fields. The force on the left strip comes from the right force only (forces from the left strip on the left strip cancel due to symmetry).

That just leaves an integral over the electric field strength multiplied by the charge density, within the borders of the strip. That integral looks easy to evaluate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
479
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
Replies
64
Views
6K