Find the following determinants

  • Thread starter Thread starter adc85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinants
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the determinants of two specific matrices, with the first being a tridiagonal matrix and the second a symmetric matrix with zeros on the diagonal. Participants suggest using row operations to simplify the matrices for easier determinant calculation. One method discussed involves subtracting rows and adding them to create zeros, ultimately leading to a simpler form for determinant calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding cofactor expansion and reduction techniques to solve determinant problems effectively.
adc85
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I know how to find the determinant in general but these two problems here are tough for me:

1. Find the determinant of:
3 -1 0 0 0
-1 3 -1 0 0
0 -1 3 -1 0
0 0 -1 3 -1
0 0 0 -1 3

2. Find the determinant of:
0 2 2 2 2
2 0 2 2 2
2 2 0 2 2
2 2 2 0 2
2 2 2 2 0

Now, I know that I need to select a row or column that contains all zeros except for one number. The row or column that the one non-zero number is on would be selected as well. Then you would use the formula (for selecting row i and column j):

det A = (-1)^(i + j) * det A (without row i and column j)

But I can't figure out how to create a row or column full of zeros (except one element) for both of these problems. Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adc85 said:
I know how to find the determinant in general but these two problems here are tough for me:

2. Find the determinant of:
0 2 2 2 2
2 0 2 2 2
2 2 0 2 2
2 2 2 0 2
2 2 2 2 0

Haven't done one of these for an age. How about this one. Subtract the row below from each row

-2 2 0 0 0
0 -2 2 0 0
0 0 -2 2 0
0 0 0 -2 2
2 2 2 2 0

Add the first 4, then the next 3 then the next 2

-2 0 0 0 2
0 -2 0 0 2
0 0 -2 0 2
0 0 0 -2 2
2 2 2 2 0

Add the first 4 to the last

-2 0 0 0 2
0 -2 0 0 2
0 0 -2 0 2
0 0 0 -2 2
0 0 0 0 8

Subtrace 1/4 of last from each of the others

-2 0 0 0 0
0 -2 0 0 0
0 0 -2 0 0
0 0 0 -2 0
0 0 0 0 8

Det = 128
 
you can use cofactor formula or just do elimination like what OlderDan did. i prefer doing elimination and multiply diagonals to get determinant. i think that's how computer does it also. however on a test, you might have to write down the cofactors explicitly. i don't really remember all the details, but i believe the general idea is to reduce the problem from finding det of large matrix to a small one.
I'll illustrate w/ a smaller matrix
a b c
d e f
g h i

if you expand along the first row, it's
a * det(e f; h i) - b * det(d f; g i) + c * det(d e; g h)
so you can see, the general pattern is
(entry j from row 1) * (det of matrix w/ row 1, column j erased) * (-1)^(row+col)
i think the sign is built into cofactors, but from here i hope you can see its like reduction formula. i mean you can reduce it to finding det of 1x1 matrix.
det(e f; h i) = e * det(i) - f * det(h)
again the sign comes from (-1)^(row+col)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K