Find The Impedance For Two Complex Impedances in Parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ascendant0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Parallel
Ascendant0
Messages
175
Reaction score
38
Homework Statement
Find the impedance of ##z_1## and ##z_2## in parallel: ##z_1 = 2+3i##, ## z_2 = 1-5i##
Relevant Equations
##(z_1^{-1} + z_2^{-1})^{-1}##
Finding the series for the first part of the problem was easy, but for parallel, I'm not sure how to separate the real from the imaginary in the fractions after I add them together?

So, I take: ##(1/(2+3i) + 1/(1-5i)^{-1}##, and after I combine the denominators and combine all terms, I end up with:

##(17-7i)/(3-2i)##

From here, I'm not sure how to separate them? I see in the answer for this one they simply have ##5+i##, but I don't see how to reduce what I have and separate the real and imaginary parts like that. Was there a different way I should've done this, or is there just some way to separate what I have above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ascendant0 said:
Homework Statement: Find the impedance of ##z_1## and ##z_2## in parallel: ##z_1 = 2+3i##, ## z_2 = 1-5i##
Relevant Equations: ##(z_1^{-1} + z_2^{-1})^{-1}##

Finding the series for the first part of the problem was easy, but for parallel, I'm not sure how to separate the real from the imaginary in the fractions after I add them together?

So, I take: ##(1/(2+3i) + 1/(1-5i)^{-1}##, and after I combine the denominators and combine all terms, I end up with:

##(17-7i)/(3-2i)##

From here, I'm not sure how to separate them? I see in the answer for this one they simply have ##5+i##, but I don't see how to reduce what I have and separate the real and imaginary parts like that. Was there a different way I should've done this, or is there just some way to separate what I have above?
You can always make the denominator real by multiplying denominator and numerator by the conjugate of the denominator (##3+2i##).
 
  • Like
Likes Ascendant0 and FactChecker
Ascendant0 said:
I end up with:

##(17-7i)/(3-2i)##
Good work! Your answer is correct. All you need to do is to simplify it as @Orodruin suggests.
 
Orodruin said:
You can always make the denominator real by multiplying denominator and numerator by the conjugate of the denominator (##3+2i##).
Thanks, yea I realized that this morning. I was half-asleep when I was doing this last night, and for some reason wasn't thinking of that. I appreciate the suggestion, and I did take care of that earlier, and got the ##5 + i## value.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and hutchphd
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top