Find the maximum length of x that will maintain equilibrium

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the maximum length \( x \) of a plank that can extend over the edge of another plank while maintaining equilibrium. Participants explore concepts of moments and forces, emphasizing that the pivot point is at the edge of the lower plank. The calculations involve balancing the clockwise and counter-clockwise moments, leading to the conclusion that the maximum length \( x \) before toppling occurs is approximately 1.33 meters. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the center of gravity and the distribution of mass in the planks. Ultimately, the participants arrive at a solution through collaborative problem-solving and experimentation.
  • #31
tnich said:
What would Isaac Newton have to say about the force acting on the part of the board hanging over?
If you were balancing something on your finger, would you say that gravity acted at the edge of it?

I would say that the force of the part hanging over is acting down, while the force of the pivot of the board is acting up
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Richie Smash said:
I would say that the force of the part hanging over is acting down, while the force of the pivot of the board is acting up
Trying writing an equation for the force on the left side of the board.
 
  • #33
l-x *F= moment
 
  • #34
Richie Smash said:
l-x *F= moment
Write an equation for F.
 
  • #35
F=m*g

So

l-x *m*g = moment
 
  • #36
Richie Smash said:
F=m*g
Right. Now what is the mass of the part of the board hanging over?
 
  • #37
The mass is... m?
 
  • #38
Richie Smash said:
The mass is... m?
Say the mass of the board is m. How much of that mass is hanging over the edge?
 
  • #39
m/10 Kg
 
  • #40
Richie Smash said:
m/10 Kg
What is the fraction of the board hanging over?
 
  • Like
Likes Richie Smash
  • #41
Sorry that I can't figure this out,

I know the fraction of the board in length hanging over is x/l and I suppose for the mass it would be x/m?
 
  • #42
Richie Smash said:
Might this be on the right track?
No, that is still not right.
 
  • #43
Richie Smash said:
Sorry that I can't figure this out,

I know the fraction of the board in length hanging over is x/l and I suppose for the mass it would be x/m?
Let's try it this way. What is the mass per unit length of the board?
 
  • #44
That would be 5kg per metre
 
  • #45
Richie Smash said:
That would be 5kg per metre
OK. If x meters of board are hanging over, how many kilograms would that be?
 
  • #46
x Kg
 
  • #47
Richie Smash said:
x Kg
No. x is a measure of length in meters. You have the mass per length of the board as 5kg/m, so how would you find the mass of x meters of board?
 
  • #48
Sorry, got to go.
 
  • #49
Hello, I have figured out that it would be 5x Kg.

I cannot figure out this problem, so I won't bother anyone, I apologize for so much posts.
 
  • #50
Richie Smash said:
Hello, I have figured out that it would be 5x Kg.
Correct.

So we know that if x of the plank extends out, the mass of that portion of the plank is 5x.
The center of gravity of that portion of the plank is how far out from the edge?

Hint: that section starts at 0 from the edge and extends to x from the edge. Its average position is ___ from the edge?

[It would have been nice to keep this symbolic, so that the mass of the portion that extends over the edge is ##m \cdot \frac{x}{l}## but we can go with 5x instead]
 
  • #51
Would the average position be 5/x?

I hope I am not judged for having so many posts in one question, this concept is foreign to me.
 
  • #52
Richie Smash said:
Would the average position be 5/x?

I hope I am not judged for having so many posts in one question, this concept is foreign to me.
You seem to be just guessing. Try figuring it out.
 
  • #53
Richie Smash said:
I did it with two books just now and it seems to be about half the length of book with length of about 25cm is the point of max equilibrium.
Very good! It earned you a like. From old days you may remember the see-saw that is horizontal if both loads are the same and at the same distance. No toppling if moments clockwise and anticlockwise cancel. And the support is in the center (something else you can discover from the books experiment: the main contact force in the extreme situation is at the edge of the supporting book). You could draw a free body diagram of the forces that act for the top book and check force and moment balances.
 
  • #54
cg = ((m1 * x1) + (m2 * x2))/ (m1 + m2).

I found this on a website, but I was only asked to find the COG for the right side, so perhaps I would exclude m2 and x2

and write that the average position of the COG on the right side is (5x *x)/5x
 
  • #55
Richie Smash said:
cg = ((m1 * x1) + (m2 * x2))/ (m1 + m2).

I found this on a website, but I was only asked to find the COG for the right side, so perhaps I would exclude m2 and x2

and write that the average position of the COG on the right side is (5x *x)/5x
That cannot be right. (5x*x)/5x simplifies to just x. That would put the center of gravity of the right half of the board exactly at the tip of the board.

Hint: The center of gravity of a uniform object is in the middle of the object.
 
  • #56
Oh I didnt know that!

Then it would simply be x/2 yes?
 
  • #57
Richie Smash said:
Oh I didnt know that!

Then it would simply be x/2 yes?
Yes!
 
  • #58
Ah hold on mr J briggs, I'm on to something, the centre of gravity is a the point where the total weight is acting upon it, we know the mass.. we know the length..

The full equation is x *5x *x/2?

Or perhaps just x*x/2

This is for the left side only
 
  • #59
Richie Smash said:
Ah hold on mr J briggs, I'm on to something, the centre of gravity is a the point where the total weight is acting upon it, we know the mass.. we know the length..

The full equation is x *5x *x/2?
The full equation for what? The torque due to gravity acting on the right half of the top board?

We have the position of the center of gravity: x/2.
We have the mass of the right half. 5x.
Where did that extra x come from?
 
  • #60
Ah yes I see you're right, I understand now finally... wow..

So would you confirm 5x2/2 is onto something?
 
  • Like
Likes tnich

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K