MHB Find Min Value of Expression: $\prod_{i=1}^{2017}x_i$

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
If $x_1,x_2,...,x_{2017} \in\Bbb{R}_+$
and $\frac{1}{1+x_1}+\frac{1}{1+x_2}+...+\frac{1}{1+x_{2017}} = 1$
- then find the minimal possible value of the expression: \[\prod_{i=1}^{2017}x_i\]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

By cyclic symmetry, we know the critical value is at the point:

$$\left(x_1,\cdots,x_{2017}\right)=(2016,\cdots,2016)$$

And the objection function at that point is:

$$f(2016,\cdots,2016)=2016^{2017}$$

Now, looking at another point on the constraint:

$$\left(4032,4032,\cdots,4032,\frac{2016}{2017}\right)$$

We find the objective function at that point is:

$$f\left(4032,4032,\cdots,4032,\frac{2016}{2017}\right)=\frac{2^{2016}2016^{2017}}{2017}>2016^{2017}$$

And so we conclude:

$$f_{\min}=2016^{2017}$$
 
MarkFL said:
My solution:

By cyclic symmetry, we know the critical value is at the point:

$$\left(x_1,\cdots,x_{2017}\right)=(2016,\cdots,2016)$$

And the objection function at that point is:

$$f(2016,\cdots,2016)=2016^{2017}$$

Now, looking at another point on the constraint:

$$\left(4032,4032,\cdots,4032,\frac{2016}{2017}\right)$$

We find the objective function at that point is:

$$f\left(4032,4032,\cdots,4032,\frac{2016}{2017}\right)=\frac{2^{2016}2016^{2017}}{2017}>2016^{2017}$$

And so we conclude:

$$f_{\min}=2016^{2017}$$

Thankyou, MarkFL for your correct solution!:cool:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top