Find the normalisation constant using a trial wavefunction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the normalization constant for a trial wavefunction of a particle confined in a one-dimensional infinite potential well. The potential is defined as zero within the interval [0, 1] and infinite elsewhere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normalization condition for the trial wavefunction and the integration process required to verify the normalization constant. Questions are raised about the correctness of the expansion of the trial wavefunction and the subsequent integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on expanding the trial wavefunction and integrating it, while others express uncertainty about their calculations. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations regarding the expansion process and the expected results for the normalization constant.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific value for K (K=210), which raises questions about the notation used in the problem statement. Participants are also navigating the implications of expanding the function before or after integration.

martinhiggs
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a particle of mass m, confined to a one dimensional infinite potential of
0[tex]\leq[/tex]x[tex]\leq[/tex]1 V(x) = 0
elsewhere V(x) = [tex]\infty[/tex]

Homework Equations



Choose as a trial wavefunction

[tex]\Psi[/tex](x) = Nx[1 - [tex]\alpha[/tex]x + ([tex]\alpha[/tex] - 1)x[tex]^{2}[/tex]]

Verify that

N[tex]^{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{K}{16 - 11\alpha + 2\alpha^{2}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



1 = <[tex]\Psi[/tex]|[tex]\Psi[/tex]>

1 = [tex]\int^{1}_{0}[/tex]Nx[1 - [tex]\alpha[/tex]x + ([tex]\alpha[/tex] - 1)x[tex]^{2}[/tex]] Nx[1 - [tex]\alpha[/tex]x + ([tex]\alpha[/tex] - 1)x[tex]^{2}[/tex]] dx

1 = N[tex]^{2}[/tex] [tex]\int^{1}_{0}[/tex] x[tex]^{2}[/tex][1 - [tex]\alpha[/tex]x + ([tex]\alpha[/tex] - 1)x[tex]^{2}[/tex]][tex]^{2}[/tex]

Is this right so far?? I'm not sure how to carry on. Should I expand the brackets??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
martinhiggs said:

Homework Statement



a particle of mass m, confined to a one dimensional infinite potential of
[tex]0\leq x \leq 1[/tex], [tex]V(x)=0[/tex]
elsewhere [tex]V(x)=\infty[/tex]

Homework Equations



Choose as a trial wavefunction

[tex]\Psi(x) = Nx(1 - \alpha x + (\alpha - 1)x^{2})[/tex]

Verify that

[tex]N^{2} = \frac{K}{16 - 11\alpha + 2\alpha^{2}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]1 = \langle\Psi|\Psi\rangle[/tex]

[tex]1 = \int^{1}_{0}Nx(1 - \alpha x + (\alpha - 1)x^2)\cdot Nx(1 - \alpha x + (\alpha - 1)x^{2}) \,dx[/tex]

[tex]1 = N^{2}\int^{1}_{0} x^{2}(1 - \alpha x + (\alpha - 1)x^{2})^{2}\,dx[/tex]

Is this right so far?? I'm not sure how to carry on. Should I expand the brackets??

Yes and Yes. Well, you could possibly integrate it as is, but it'd be easier to see after expanding the parenthesis.

PS: Rather than typing {tex}code{/tex} for every variable, just write the whole thing in tex, it'll look a bit nicer.
 
When I expand the brackets and multiply by x^2

I get the following:

x[tex]^{6} + x^{2} + 2 \alpha^{2} - \alpha^{4} - 2 \alpha x^{3} + \alpha^{2}x^{4} - \alpha x^{5}[/tex]


This seems totally wrong when I look at what I am supposed to get for N^2...
 
martinhiggs said:
When I expand the brackets and multiply by x^2

I get the following:

[tex]x^{6} + x^{2} + 2 \alpha^{2} - \alpha^{4} - 2 \alpha x^{3} + \alpha^{2}x^{4} - \alpha x^{5}[/tex]


This seems totally wrong when I look at what I am supposed to get for N^2...

I think you expanded incorrectly. You should get

[tex] \left(\alpha-1\right)^2x^6-2\alpha(\alpha-1)x^5+2(\alpha-1)x^4+\alpha^2x^4-2\alpha x^3+x^2[/tex]

When you integrate this over the range 0 to 1, you should get the answer.
 
If it helps see a little bit more clearly, [tex]K=210[/tex]. Not sure why your question put [tex]K[/tex] rather than [tex]210[/tex], but it is what it is.

Also, you could fully expand what I wrote down and then integrate, but you'll have a few extra terms to work with; it's usually easier to expand and regroup after integration.
 
Ah, excellent! Thank you SO much for your help! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K