MHB Find the number of line and column where the number 2002 stays.

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Column Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the position of the number 2002 in a triangular number arrangement. It is established that the nth element in the top row corresponds to the nth triangular number, and calculations show that 2002 falls within the 63rd group. Specifically, it is found that 2002 is located in row 15 and column 49. The method involves calculating triangular numbers and their relationships to derive the position accurately. Ultimately, the conclusion confirms that 2002 is at (15, 49) in the arrangement.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Positive real numbers are arranged in the form:

$$1 \;\;\; 3 \;\;\; 6 \;\;\;10 \;\;\; \cdots$$
$$2 \;\;\;5 \;\;\;9 \;\;\; \cdots$$
$$4 \;\;\;8 \;\;\; \cdots$$
$$7 \;\;\; \cdots$$

Find the number of the line and column where the number 2002 stays.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Positive real numbers are arranged in the form:

$$1 \;\;\; 3 \;\;\; 6 \;\;\;10 \;\;\; \cdots$$
$$2 \;\;\;5 \;\;\;9 \;\;\; \cdots$$
$$4 \;\;\;8 \;\;\; \cdots$$
$$7 \;\;\; \cdots$$

Find the number of the line and column where the number 2002 stays.
You will have noticed that the $n$th element in the top row is the $n$th triangular number $\frac12n(n+1)$. Then working back from that, each time you subtract $1$ you move back one column and down one row (until you reach the first column).

The $63$rd triangular number is $2016$, so that will be in row $1$, column $63$. Working back $14$ places from that, you find that $2002$ will be in row $1+14 =15$ and column $63-14=49$.
 
Thanks for your solution, Opalg! :)

My solution:

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 200"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]Number[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]Row[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]Column[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]Group[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1st[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2nd[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2nd[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3rd[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3rd[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]6[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3rd[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]7[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]8[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]9[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]10[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]11[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]12[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]13[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]14[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]15[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5th[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

To see where the number 2002 stays in the table above, we first need to investigate at which group that it lies, and this could be done in the following manner:

$$S_n=\frac{n}{2}\left(n+1\right)$$

$$2002=\frac{n}{2}\left(n+1\right)$$

$$n=62.78$$

We know that 2002 must lie in the 63th group, and to know what the previous number in the 62th group is, we do the following:

$$S_62=\frac{62}{2}\left(62+1\right)=1953$$

Thus, we have:

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 200"]
[TR]
[TD]Number[/TD]
[TD]Row[/TD]
[TD]Column[/TD]
[TD]Group[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1953[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]62[/TD]
[TD]62th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1954[/TD]
[TD]63[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]63th[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]...[/TD]
[TD]...[/TD]
[TD]...[/TD]
[TD]...[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

To find where the number 2002 lies in the 63th group, i.e. how far it is from 1954, we compute:

$$2002-1954=48$$

Hence, 2002 lies in the $$63-48=15th$$ row and the $$1+48=49th$$ column.
 
I tried to find a formula depending only on $k$, namely, given a positive integer $k$, to find its location $(C_k,R_k)$ in the table. For brevity of reference, we say that $k=(C_k,R_k)$ (abuse of notation)

Considering the obvious diagonals, it's clear that '$k$ is in the $n$'th diagonal' is equivalent to '$T_{n-1}<k\leq T_n$(*) for some integer $n\geq1$'.

Notice that for the diagonal $\{(1,n),(2,n-1),...,(1+x,n-x),...(n,1)\}$ we have $(1+x,n-x)=(1,n)-x=T_n-x$, because the numbers are consecutive.
Since $k$ lies on this diagonal, we may set $k=T_n-x$ and obtain $(C_k,R_k)=(1+(T_n-k),n-(T_n-k))$ (I expect the ambiguity of the notaion to be confusing, but I hope I'm wrong)

Now we want to "eliminate" $n$. For this, we go back to one of(*): $T_{n-1}<k\Leftrightarrow T_{n-1}+1\leq k\Leftrightarrow n^2-n+2\leq 2k\Leftrightarrow (n-1/2)^2+7/4\leq2k\Leftrightarrow n\leq\frac{(8k-7)^{1/2}+1}{2}$

From (*), it clear that $n$ is the greatest integer that satisfies $T_{n-1}<k$, and therefore the greatest to satisfy $n\leq\frac{(8k-7)^{1/2}+1}{2}$; so by definition $n=\lfloor\frac{(8k-7)^{1/2}+1}{2}\rfloor$.

At last, the answer: The location of $k$ is $(T_n-k+1,n+k-T_n)$, where $n=\lfloor\frac{(8k-7)^{1/2}+1}{2}\rfloor$.

Example: Take $k=2002$, then $n=63$ and hence $2002$ lies in $(T_{63}-2002+1,63+2002-T_{63})=(15,49)$.(Whew)

መለሰ
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top