Find the smallest value of this function.

  • Thread starter Thread starter PrudensOptimus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Value
AI Thread Summary
The function f(x) = x^2 - 3x + sqrt(x-3) - sqrt(x+3) is defined only for x ≥ 3. It is determined to be an increasing function, with the smallest value occurring at x = 3. At this point, f(3) calculates to -sqrt(6). The discussion highlights confusion regarding the interpretation of "smallest value" in relation to complex roots, clarifying that the question pertains solely to real numbers. The final consensus confirms the smallest value of the function is -sqrt(6) at x = 3.
PrudensOptimus
Messages
641
Reaction score
0
f(x) = x^2 - 3x + sqrt(x-3) - sqrt(x+3)

Using algebra, geometry, calculus, whatever you want, but do not use a calculator :p

Also must show work.

Very interesting math problem I saw on the web.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
what is with the 'n'. Isn't it supposed to be an x.

The function has complex roots because of the sqrt's. So want do you mean by smallest value. Smallest real number or smallest imaginary number?
 
both.
 
Actually, neither the question by dduardo, "The function has complex roots because of the sqrt's. So want do you mean by smallest value. Smallest real number or smallest imaginary number?", nor the response by PrudensOptimus, "Both" make any sense.

In the first place, the question asked about the smallest value of the function- it didn't say anything about roots. Secondly, the complex numbers cannot be ordered so it never makes sense to ask about the "smallest" complex number.

The function f(x)= x^2 - 3x + sqrt(x-3) - sqrt(x+3)
is only defined for x>= 3 and it's pretty easy to see that it is an increasing function. The smallest value occurs at x= 3 and is
f(3)= 9- 9+ sqrt(0)- sqrt(6)= - sqrt(6).
 
:) I got it right yay

it is from the restriction 4sqrt[(x-3)(x+3)].
 
someone show me the work for this please, I am a dumb butt..
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top