Find the volume of the parallelepiped

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the volume of a parallelepiped defined by three vectors in three-dimensional space, with a focus on the relationships between the dot product and the cross product.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the mathematical relationships involving the dot product and cross product, questioning the applicability of certain vector identities and forms in the context of calculating volume.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some providing clarifications and others expressing a desire to solidify their understanding of vector calculus. There is an ongoing examination of the relationships between the different vector operations without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a need for further elaboration on specific vector forms and their relevance to the problem at hand, while others reflect on their own understanding and the mathematical acceptability of the concepts discussed.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,833
Reaction score
426
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
vector calculus
Am refreshing on this; see attached below
1643256849273.png
ok we can also use the form ##[i×j=k, k×i=j , j×k=i]## right?

to give us say, ##w⋅(u ×v)=v⋅(w ×u)## in realizing same solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please elaborate on what you mean by "the form ##[i×j=k, k×i=j , j×k=i]##".
 
I wanted to indicate,
For any vectors in 3-dimensional space it follows that,
##w⋅(u ×v)=v⋅(w ×u)=u⋅(v ×w)##... yap with this, i should realize the same value of the required volume... the form ##[i×j=k, k×i=j , j×k=i]## is not applicable here...
 
chwala said:
the form ##[i×j=k, k×i=j , j×k=i]## is not applicable here...
Thank you for your reply.
 
Nice sysprog...I am refreshing on this area, its long since I looked at vector calculus...of course I should be able to check and prove (some of the questions that I ask) the concept given, I just want to be certain that it's mathematically acceptable from the great minds here...cheers
 
It seems to me that you're trying to solidify your understanding of the relation that the dot product has to the cross product.

It's true that if ##u##, ##v## and ##w##, are vectors in 3-space, then ##w · (u × v) = v · (w × u) = u · (v × w)##.

Interchanging two rows changes the sign of a determinant, so interchanging two rows twice results in the same-sign determinant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K