How Can Exponential Decay Reveal Initial Temperature?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Boba Fet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Initial Temperature
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of exponential decay in determining the initial temperature of a thermometer based on its readings over time. Participants explore the mathematical relationships involved in the decay process, specifically using differential equations and logarithmic transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a differential equation model for temperature decay, suggesting that the initial temperature can be derived from the thermometer's readings at specific times.
  • Another participant questions the transformation of logarithmic expressions, seeking clarification on how one expression relates to another in the context of the decay model.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the derivation of a specific logarithmic relationship and its implications for finding the initial temperature.
  • Further discussion includes the relationship between the initial temperature and the constant C in the decay equation, with some participants indicating confusion about the relevance of certain transformations.
  • One participant provides an alternative formulation of the differential equation, suggesting a method to derive the initial temperature by manipulating the equations derived from the thermometer readings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the transformations of logarithmic expressions or the best approach to find the initial temperature. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions and roles of variables in the equations, particularly the meaning of "x" and its impact on the calculations. There are also unresolved steps in the mathematical derivations presented.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in mathematical modeling of physical processes, particularly those studying thermodynamics or differential equations in the context of temperature changes over time.

Boba Fet
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Suppose that you take a thermometer outside where it is 100°.

T(5min)=80° T(15min)=90°

What is the initial temp of the thermometer?

Given equation

dT/d t= k(T-Te)

Derived Equation
⌠(T-Te)^-1 (dT/dt)dt =⌠ kdt
ln(T-Te)=kt + c
T=ce^kt + Te

so i basically got the answer by knowing c must be negative and that when i use a square root on the magnitude of c i through out the positive value.
Wolfram Alpha
my real question is how can this become -3 ln(-20/x) +ln(-10/x) becomes -2ln(-(1/x)) -ln(800)?

Attempt to find C

1) 80=ce^k5 +100 ---- -20=ce^k5 ----- -20/c=e^k5 ------ ln(-20/c)=k5 ----- -3ln(-20/c)=-k15

2) 90=ce^k15 +100 ---- -10=ce^k15 ----- -10/c=e^k15 ------ ln(-10/c)=k15

becomes

ln(-10/c) - 3ln(-20/c) ----- ln((-10/c) x (c^3 / -8000)) -------- ln(c^2/800) ---- 2ln(c) -ln(800)=0

ln(c)=(1/2)ln(800)

c= +/- sqrt(800)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
my real question is how can this[?] become -3 ln(-20/x) +ln(-10/x) becomes -2ln(-(1/x)) -ln(800)?
Are you saying that the expression:
##-3\ln\frac{-20}{x} + \ln \frac{-10}{x} = -2\ln\frac{-1}{x} - \ln 800## ... is not true?
... or you don't know how to get there from
T=ce^kt + Te
... which I am reading as ##T(t)=Ce^{kt} + T_e##?

The rest of your post appears to show you doing the calculation (though you need to say what finding "C" does for you.)
 
Last edited:
Do you know the relationship between the initial temperature and C?
Boba Fet said:
yes i don't know how to get there
− 3 ln − 20 x + ln − 10 x = − 2 ln − 1 x − ln 800 −3ln⁡−20x+ln⁡−10x=−2ln⁡−1x−ln⁡800
... that last bit does not make sense.
Off post #1, the way to understand how to get "there" must start from knowing what "x" stands for.
However, if you can find the initial temperature without going "there", then why bother?
 
Your solution to the differential equation should read:$$(T_e-T)=(T_e-T_0)e^{-kt}$$
So, $$20=(T_e-T_0)e^{-5k}\tag{1}$$
$$10=(T_e-T_0)e^{-15k}\tag{2}$$If you cube Eqn. 1, you get:$$8000=(T_e-T_0)^3e^{-15k}\tag{3}$$
What do you get if you divide Eqn. 3 by Eqn. 2?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K