Find time given a force with respect to displacement

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a general formula for the time it takes for an object to move from a displacement of 0 to 20 meters under a force defined by F(x) = 2000 - 100x. The force decreases linearly from 2000 Newtons at 0 displacement to 0 Newtons at 20 meters, with no friction or air resistance considered. Participants suggest using Newton's second law to derive a second-order differential equation, which can then be solved to find displacement as a function of time. There is debate over the necessity of integrating force with respect to time versus displacement, with some arguing that the differential equation approach is more efficient. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexity of integrating force as a function of displacement to derive time.
Kiwigami
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


With a function that gives Force with respect to Displacement (F(x) = 2000-100x), is there a way to find a general formula for the time it takes from displacement 0 to 20? The force is acting on an object, pushing it horizontally. Assume no friction and no air resistance.

Homework Equations


Force with respect to Displacement (x):
F(x) = 2000-100x
At 0 displacement, there's 2000 Newton of force acting on the object, and the force linearly decreases until there's no force at 20 meters away and beyond.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Work = ∫ from 0 to b of (F * dx) = ∫ from 0 to b of (2000-100x) dx = -50(b- 40)b
Work = Final Kinetic Energy - Initial Kinetic Energy. Initially, the object is stationary with no initial velocity, so I'm assuming that the initial Kinetic Energy is 0.

Work(b) = Kinetic Energy(b) = -50(b - 40)b = 0.5mv^2.

Solving for v, I get: v(b) = sqrt((2/m) * -50(b - 40)b)

From here, I'm tempted to plug velocity into this formula (Displacement = Velocity * Time) and solve for time, but I feel like this won't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you only need Newtons II law to solve this. You get 2. order differencial equation. General formula has mass as variable.
 
Kiwigami said:
Displacement = Velocity * Time
That is only true for constant velocity. The general expression is the integral of velocity wrt time. That will give you a differential equation to solve.
olgerm said:
I think you only need Newtons II law to solve this. You get 2. order differencial equation. General formula has mass as variable.
The first integration stage from that equation produces the energy relation Kiwigami obtained, so there is no benefit in going that route.
 
haruspex said:
The first integration stage from that equation produces the energy relation Kiwigami obtained, so there is no benefit in going that route.
I meant integrating over time.
 
olgerm said:
I meant integrating over time.
How are you going to do that, given acceleration as a function of distance?
 
haruspex said:
How are you going to do that, given acceleration as a function of distance?
just write Newton's II law(##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=F/m##) and replace F to function, that he gave. Doing that will result getting second-order linear ordinary differential equation. Also is known that displacement and speed at time 0 are 0.
 
olgerm said:
just write Newton's II law(##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=F/m##) and replace F to function, that he gave. Doing that will result getting second-order linear ordinary differential equation. Also is known that displacement and speed at time 0 are 0.
You did not answer my question. How are you going to integrate F, a function of x, with respect to time?
 
haruspex said:
How are you going to integrate F, a function of x, with respect to time?
By writing Newton's II law(##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=F/m##) and replacing force F to function, that he gave and taking undefined time-integral of both sides. Taking this integral is not necessary.
##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=\frac{2000-100x}{m}## ⇔ ##x+k_1+k_2 \cdot t=\iint(dt^2 \cdot \frac{2000-100x}{m})## .
by ##x(0)=0## and ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}(0)=0## we know that ##k_1=0## and ##k_2=0##.
 
Last edited:
olgerm said:
By writing Newton's II law(##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=F/m##) and replacing force F to function, that he gave and taking undefined time-integral of both sides. Taking this integral is not necessary.
##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=\frac{2000-100x}{m}## ⇔ ##x+k_1+k_2 \cdot t=\iint(dt^2 \cdot \frac{2000-100x}{m})## .
by ##x(0)=0## and ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}(0)=0## we know that ##k_1=0## and ##k_2=0##.
I ask a third time, how are you going to perform that integral of x wrt time? Writing down the integral doesn't answer it, you actually need to integrate it.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
how are you going to perform that integral of x wrt time? Writing down the integral doesn't answer it, you actually need to integrate it.
It (##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=\frac{2000-100x}{m}##) is called differential equation. Before solving it I can't find that ##\iint(dt^2 \cdot \frac{2000-100x}{m})+k_3+k_4 \cdot t= c_2 \cdot sin(\frac{10 \cdot t}{\sqrt{m}}) + c_1 \cdot cos(\frac{10\cdot t}{\sqrt{m}}) +20##
, but after solving it I can.
 
  • #11
olgerm said:
It (##\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial t^2}=\frac{2000-100x}{m}##) is called differential equation. Before solving it I can't find that ##\iint(dt^2 \cdot \frac{2000-100x}{m})+k_3+k_4 \cdot t= c_2 \cdot sin(\frac{10 \cdot t}{\sqrt{m}}) + c_1 \cdot cos(\frac{10\cdot t}{\sqrt{m}}) +20##
, but after solving it I can.
But having solved the D.E. by some other method, you do not need to do this integral, so writing it out as a double integral of x wrt t was a complete waste of time. Including mine.
 
  • #12
Kiwigami said:

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Work = ∫ from 0 to b of (F * dx) = ∫ from 0 to b of (2000-100x) dx = -50(b- 40)b
Work = Final Kinetic Energy - Initial Kinetic Energy. Initially, the object is stationary with no initial velocity, so I'm assuming that the initial Kinetic Energy is 0.

Work(b) = Kinetic Energy(b) = -50(b - 40)b = 0.5mv^2.

Solving for v, I get: v(b) = sqrt((2/m) * -50(b - 40)b)
What if you repeat the above calculation, but you integrate from 0 to some arbitrary value of x between 0 and b? Would you then be able to obtain an expression for the velocity as a function of x?
 
  • #13
Kiwigami said:

Homework Statement


With a function that gives Force with respect to Displacement (F(x) = 2000-100x), is there a way to find a general formula for the time it takes from displacement 0 to 20? The force is acting on an object, pushing it horizontally. Assume no friction and no air resistance.

Homework Equations


Force with respect to Displacement (x):
F(x) = 2000-100x
At 0 displacement, there's 2000 Newton of force acting on the object, and the force linearly decreases until there's no force at 20 meters away and beyond.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Work = ∫ from 0 to b of (F * dx) = ∫ from 0 to b of (2000-100x) dx = -50(b- 40)b
Work = Final Kinetic Energy - Initial Kinetic Energy. Initially, the object is stationary with no initial velocity, so I'm assuming that the initial Kinetic Energy is 0.

Work(b) = Kinetic Energy(b) = -50(b - 40)b = 0.5mv^2.

Solving for v, I get: v(b) = sqrt((2/m) * -50(b - 40)b)

From here, I'm tempted to plug velocity into this formula (Displacement = Velocity * Time) and solve for time, but I feel like this won't work.
Things simplify if you recognize that you can write ##F = -100(x-20)##, so in terms of the new displacement variable ##y = x - 20## the force law is just ##F = - 100y##. This is Hooke's law (for stretching forces in a spring), so a Google search on "Hookes law" might be very helpful.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes TSny

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K