MHB Is the Equation $ |tanx + cotx| = |tanx| + |cotx| $ True for Any Value of $x$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaalChawal
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation |tanx + cotx| = |tanx| + |cotx| is true for any value of x except at points where tanx or cotx are undefined, specifically at nπ and (2n+1)π/2. Since tanx and cotx share the same sign for all valid x, the equation holds true in those ranges. The discussion references the Triangle Inequality, which states that |a + b| is less than or equal to |a| + |b|, but in this case, equality is achieved when both terms are non-zero. Therefore, the equation is valid as long as x is not at the points where tanx or cotx are undefined. This confirms the equation's validity under specified conditions.
DaalChawal
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Q. Is $ |tanx + cotx| = |tanx| + |cotx| $ true for any $x?$ If it is true, then find the values of $x$.

My Working -->

Since $tanx$ and $cotx$ always have the same sign, so this holds true for any value of $x$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay I think this should hold true for any $x$ except $n \pi$ , $\frac{(2n+1) \pi }{2}$
Am I correct?
 
In general, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| a + b \right| \not\equiv \left| a \right| + \left| b \right| \end{align*}$, rather $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| a + b \right| \leq \left| a \right| + \left| b \right| \end{align*}$. That's called the Triangle Inequality.
 
DaalChawal said:
Q. Is $ |tanx + cotx| = |tanx| + |cotx| $ true for any $x?$ If it is true, then find the values of $x$.

My Working -->

Since $tanx$ and $cotx$ always have the same sign, so this holds true for any value of $x$.
You have to be a bit more careful than this, as Prove It says but you essentially have [math]\left | y + \dfrac{1}{y} \right | = |y| + \left | \dfrac{1}{y} \right |[/math], which is true for [math]y \neq 0[/math].

So, yes.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top