Finding a matrix P that orthogonally diagonalizes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iconate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a matrix P that orthogonally diagonalizes the matrix I - vvT, where v is given as (1, 0, 1). The discussion centers around the characteristic equation derived from this matrix and the implications of its eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the characteristic equation and identify eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors for the matrix A. Some participants question the accuracy of the determinant equation and suggest verifying the calculations. Others propose exploring the relationship between the eigenvectors of A and vvT, and the implications of having a zero eigenvalue.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and questioning assumptions. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the original poster's approach, and multiple interpretations of the eigenvalue implications are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the zero vector is typically not included in eigenvalue solutions, and there is a discussion about the implications of having a zero eigenvalue in relation to the singularity of the matrix.

Iconate
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a matrix P that orthogonally diagonalizes I - vvT if

v = (1, 0, 1)

Homework Equations


Well, solving I - vvT will give me my A if I am correct, and the characteristic equation for A is

det([tex]\lambda[/tex]I - A) = [tex]\lambda[/tex]3 - 2[tex]\lambda[/tex]2 = 0

Solving this gives me [tex]\lambda[/tex]1 = 0 and [tex]\lambda[/tex]2 = 2

Now when I substitute these values back into det([tex]\lambda[/tex]I - A) I only get 2 basis vectors for my P. (1, 0, 1) and (-1, 0, 1). Since I don't have 3 vectors I'm not going to yet normalize them, which has to be done before they become the column vectors of P.

Any help for finding this P would be great

EDIT : I guess technically I also have a 3rd basis vector (0, 0, 0) with [tex]\lambda[/tex]=0 am I able to use the zero vector?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sure about you determinant eqaution? maybe show how you got there... and your matrix

hint: if I've done it right & i multiply your first eignevector by the matrix A, I get 1x the eigenvector...
 
Last edited:
also i notice if
A = I - vvT

and u is an eignevector of A, with value m, then you should be able to show that u is also an eignevector of vvT with related eigenvalues, and it should be reasonably easy to guess the eigenvectors of vvT ro maybe even A
 
Last edited:
and one more...

to clarify in this case, 0 is an eignvalue of vvT but not A

When 0 is an eigenvector, it means the matrix is singular, with the eigenvectors corresponding to the 0 eigenvalue, belonging to the null space of the matrix

note that the zero vector, 0 is never included in the solutions to eigenvalue equation
Au = mu
as it it always a solution reagrdless of eigenvalue (considered the trvial solution).

So the zero eigenvalue will have corresponding non-zero eigenvector/s.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K