Finding a Particle's Location in 3D from 2D Information

AI Thread Summary
A particle's location can be precisely defined in 2D using coordinates, such as (2,3) from the equation y=x+1. However, determining its position in the 3rd dimension requires additional information beyond the 2D data provided. Without further context or parameters, the 3D location remains indeterminate. Therefore, while 2D coordinates offer clarity in two dimensions, they do not suffice for establishing a complete 3D position. Additional data is essential for a comprehensive spatial understanding.
hollowx9
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Given the equation y=x + 1, x=2. Then y=3, I have just clearly specified Exactly where a particle is in 2 dimensions, it is at the location (2,3) in the Cartesian plane. If given the information of where a particle is in 2 dimensions is it possible to find its location in the 3rd dimension?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not without further information.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

B 4th spatial dimension thought experiment
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Adding 'z' to 2D graph equation
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Chiral symmetries in E[SUP]^n[/SUP]
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Notation for a "scalar absolute field"?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Finding vertex of a 3D Triangle on a Plane
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Reprise: Calculate the distance between two points without using a coordinate system
Replies
1
Views
2K
What is the Calculation for 3D Slope?
Replies
3
Views
2K
3D space interface to other dimensions
Replies
2
Views
2K
Big Ben In N Dimensions
Replies
6
Views
755
I A way to comprehend the geometry of a hypercube
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top