Finding Acceleration Experimentally

  • Thread starter Thread starter Power of One
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
When calculating acceleration experimentally, two methods yield different results due to the distinction between average velocity and change in velocity. The first method, using the equation Δx = Vi t + 0.5at², provides a more accurate acceleration value, while the second method, which uses average velocity (v = Δx/Δt), leads to an incorrect calculation. For a displacement of 2m and a time of 0.5 seconds, the first method results in an acceleration of 16 m/s², whereas the second gives 8 m/s². The discrepancy arises because average velocity cannot be substituted for change in velocity in the second method. Therefore, the first method is recommended for accurate acceleration determination.
Power of One
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
You drop an object. You take the time it takes to hit the ground. So you have Δx (displacement) and Δx (time).

To find acceleration do you use

xf= xi + Vi t + .5at2
Δ x= Vi t + .5at2
Δ x- Vi t=.5at2
a= 2(Δ x- Vit )/ t2

or do you use

v= Δ x/ Δ t
a= Δ v/ Δ t

Should acceleration come out the same? Why do they differ so much? Take example a Δx of 2m and a time of .5. Using the first equation you get 16 m/s^2. But using the second method, you get 8 m/s^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the first method. The second method is wrong. The key problem is that v=Δx/Δt is an average velocity, not a change in velocity. So you cannot turn around and plug v into the spot for Δv in the second expression. In other words, an average v is not a Δv. In fact, in this case the change in velocity is twice the average velocity (that should not be too surprising) which is where the factor of 2 comes from.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top