Finding acceleration of block connected to pulley with mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the acceleration of a block connected to a pulley system that includes both a larger and a smaller pulley, with considerations of mass and tension in the ropes involved.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore free body diagrams and force balances for both pulleys and the block. There are attempts to relate angular acceleration to linear acceleration and to establish relationships between different tensions in the system. Questions arise regarding the assumptions of tension uniformity in a massless string and the implications of pulleys with mass.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying their understanding of the relationships between tensions and accelerations in the system. Some have provided guidance on re-evaluating force balances and kinematic relationships, while others are seeking to establish a clearer connection between the various equations and unknowns involved.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the assumptions about the mass of the string and the nature of the tensions in the system, as well as the requirement to derive relationships among multiple unknowns through algebraic equations.

AdityaDev
Messages
527
Reaction score
33

Homework Statement


20150430_173846-1.jpg


Homework Equations


a=Rα

The Attempt at a Solution


Free body diagrams:
20150430_174902-1-1-1.jpg

For larger pulley, TR=Iα ⇒ T=½MRα
If this pulley rotates by some amount suchat x length of rope becomes free, and if I hold the smaller pulley at rest, then this extra length of rope comes bellow the pulley. So the small pulley can go down by x/2 distance.
Hence for every θ rotation, the small pulley goes down by Rθ/2.
For smaller pulley, T'-2T+Mg/2=Ma/2 and for block, T'=Ma+Mg
So ssubstituting T', 2T-Ma/2=3Mg/2
Now if rope comes down at a rate of Rα, then pulley goes down by Rα/2
Hence a=Rα/2
After plugging in all values, I am not getting the answer.
 

Attachments

  • 20150430_174902-1.jpg
    20150430_174902-1.jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 350
Physics news on Phys.org
Please re-check your force balance on the block.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Please re-check your force balance on the block.

Chet
Its Mg-T'=Ma so T'=Mg-Ma
T'-2T+Mg/2=Ma/2
Substituting...
3Mg/2-2T=3Ma/2
So 3Mg/2=¾MRα+MRα=7/4 (MRα)
 
So does this give the "correct answer" now?

Chet
 
It doesnt. Its given that the acceleration of block is 2g/5.
 
AdityaDev said:
It doesnt. Its given that the acceleration of block is 2g/5.
OK. Here are a couple of things to think about:

1. The angular acceleration of the upper pulley is not equal to the acceleration of the block divided by R. Kinematically, the tangential velocity of the upper pulley is twice the downward velocity of the block.

2. The two tensions, which you call T, are not equal. There has to be a tension difference in order to rotationally accelerate the lower pulley. You need to do a moment balance on the lower pulley.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdityaDev
Chestermiller said:
OK. Here are a couple of things to think about:

1. The angular acceleration of the upper pulley is not equal to the acceleration of the block divided by R. Kinematically, the tangential velocity of the upper pulley is twice the downward velocity of the block.
I already proved this in post 1.
can there be two different tensions on a single massless string?
 
AdityaDev said:
I already proved this in post 1.
can there be two different tensions on a single massless string?
Yes, if it is turning a pulley with mass, and does not slip.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdityaDev
How? If yes, then does the tension change uniformly? If a segment of massless string has two different forces on either end, then it will have a non zero acceleration.
 
  • #10
AdityaDev said:
How? If yes, then does the tension change uniformly? If a segment of massless string has two different forces on either end, then it will have a non zero acceleration.
There is a distributed tangential static frictional force exerted on the string by the pulley over its contact length with the pulley.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdityaDev
  • #11
I am not able to find a relation between the three tensions.
 
  • #12
AdityaDev said:
I am not able to find a relation between the three tensions.
OK. You are basically dealing with 4 linear algebraic equations in 4 unknowns.

Unknowns:
1. Tension in the part of the upper rope to the left of the lower pulley TL
2. Tension in the part of the upper rope to the right of the lower pulley TR
3. Tension in the lower rope T'
4. Acceleration of the block a

Equations:
1. Moment balance on upper pulley
2. Moment balance on lower pulley
3. Force balance on lower pulley
4. Force balance on block

In my judgement, the complicated part of this problem is not in setting up the force and moment balances. It is in establishing the kinematics. Please summarize for me again, in terms of the acceleration of the lower pulley a, what you got for

1. The angular acceleration of the upper pulley αU
2. The angular acceleration of the lower pulley αL

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdityaDev
  • #13
New equations:

1)torque equation for large pulley
##T_1=1/2MR\alpha##

2)torque equations for small pulley
##(T_2-T_1)R/2=\frac{1}{2}\frac{M}{2}\frac{R^2}{4}\alpha_1##
##T_2-T_1=\frac{MR^2\alpha_1}{8}##

3)Force equation for block

##Mg-T_3=Ma_1##

4)Force equation for small pulley
##T_3-T_1-T_2+Mg/2=Ma_1/2##

5)Relation connecting ##\alpha_1## and ##\alpha_2##
If Rθ string comes out, then the pulley moves down by Rθ/2.
And i know that if lower pulley rotates by 2π, it moves a distance of 2πR/2 since radius is R/2.
To move a distance of Rθ/2, the pulley has to rotate by ##\frac{2\pi}{\pi R}.R\theta/2=\theta##
So if upper pulley rotates by θ, then the lower pulley also rotates by θ?
 
  • #14
Yes. Everything is correct.

So, in your notation, ##α=α_1=\frac{2a_1}{R}##

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdityaDev
  • #15
Now ##T_1=1/2MR\alpha##
##T_2=T_1+1/8MR\alpha=(5/8)MR\alpha##
##T_3=Mg-(1/2)MR\alpha##
Now ##Mg-(1/2)MR\alpha-1/2MR\alpha-(5/8)MR\alpha+Mg/2=(1/4)MR\alpha##
Got the answer. Thank you for helping.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K