Finding an integral using a series

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Series
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


##\displaystyle \int_0^1 \frac{\arctan x}{x}dx##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted the integral to the following; ##\displaystyle \int_0^1 \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n\frac{x^{2n}}{2n+1}dx##. In this case am I allowed to swap the summation and integral signs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


##\displaystyle \int_0^1 \frac{\arctan x}{x}dx##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted the integral to the following; ##\displaystyle \int_0^1 \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n\frac{x^{2n}}{2n+1}dx##. In this case am I allowed to swap the summation and integral signs?
Since the series is absolutely convergent on the interval in question, yes, you can exchange the operations. Here's a link to another thread that discusses this -- https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ntegral-differentiation-with-integral.564620/.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97
Mark44 said:
Since the series is absolutely convergent on the interval in question, yes, you can exchange the operations. Here's a link to another thread that discusses this -- https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ntegral-differentiation-with-integral.564620/.

This argument does not quite work: the series is absolutely convergent on the open interval ##0 \leq x < 1## but is only conditionally convergent at ##x=1##. However, the OP can try another argument instead: he can check for uniform convergence on the closed interval, and that will be enough. See, eg.,
https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~agk22/uniform.pdf .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ray Vickson said:
This argument does not quite work: the series is absolutely convergent on the open interval ##0 \leq x < 1## but is only conditionally convergent at ##x=1##. However, the OP can try another argument instead: he can check for uniform convergence on the closed interval, and that will be enough. See, eg.,
https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~agk22/uniform.pdf .
I was a bit worried about that endpoint at x = 1, but didn't include my concern in what I wrote.