Finding angular acceleration of pulley attached to a mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block sliding down a frictionless incline connected to a pulley. The block has a mass of 2 kg and is inclined at 53 degrees, while the pulley has a mass of 4 kg and a radius of 0.5 m. The objective is to find the angular acceleration of the pulley.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss applying Newton's second law to both the block and the pulley, expressing forces and tensions in terms of acceleration.
  • Some participants question the assumptions regarding the forces acting on the pulley and the nature of the acceleration involved.
  • There is exploration of torque equations and the moment of inertia for the pulley, with some confusion about which forces contribute to torque.
  • Concerns are raised about the relationship between linear acceleration and angular acceleration, particularly in the context of the block's motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the correct application of torque and forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the moment of inertia and the forces that cause torque, but there is still uncertainty about the correct approach to relate the block's motion to the pulley’s angular acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of explicit final answers and express uncertainty about the assumptions made in the problem setup, particularly regarding the acceleration of the block and the forces acting on the pulley.

vetgirl1990
Messages
85
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A block of mass 2kg (mb) can slide down a frictionless 53 degree inclune, but it is connected to a pulley of mass 4kg (mp with a radius of 0.5m. The pulley may be treated as a disk.
What is the angular acceleration of the pulley?

Homework Equations


a = rα

The Attempt at a Solution


I first expressed each object in terms of Newton's 2nd Law
BLOCK:
ΣFx = mbsinθ - T = mba
ΣFy = N - mgsinθ = 0

PULLEY:
ΣFx = T = mmpa
ΣFy = N-mg = 0

Then, isolated for T (tension) for both the block and pulley and equated them to each other. Their tension would be the same because the pulley and block are connected by the same rope.
(1) T = mbgsinθ - mba
(2) T =mpa
mpa = mbgsinθ - mba
a = mbgsinθ / (mb + mp)
a = 2.6m/s

α = a/r = (2.6m/s/s) / 0.5m = 5.22rads/s/s

CONCERNS:
We weren't given the final answer, so I'm not sure if my approach is correct. But I have a feeling that my Newton's 2nd Law (N2L) expression for the pulley is incorrect.
ΣFx = T = mpa
Since the pulley is rotating, would the acceleration in N2L be CENTRIPETAL ACCELERATION?
However, if this was the case, then the expression would turn into: ΣFx = T = mpv2/r

This introduces another unknown -- velocity! If this were the case, I don't know how to solve the problem.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you are not being asked for the acceleration of the pulley, it is likely considered fixed and rotating around its center. The pulley will therefore be assumed to have an additional constraining force at the center and so The force equation will give you nothing. You are asked for the angular acceleration, which is the rare of change of its angular velocity (how fast it rotates).
 
Orodruin said:
No, you are not being asked for the acceleration of the pulley, it is likely considered fixed and rotating around its center. The pulley will therefore be assumed to have an additional constraining force at the center and so The force equation will give you nothing. You are asked for the angular acceleration, which is the rare of change of its angular velocity (how fast it rotates).

I'm not quite sure what you mean by constraining force at the centre, and why the this would mean the force equation would give nothing. Would you be able to clarify?

Then, since I can't work with the block and pulley's force equations, I'm not quite sure where to start with finding the angular acceleration.
I'm thinking using Στ = Iα
Where the y-component of the block's gravity (mgsinθ) causes the torque (ie. the pulley to spin), and I = mr2

Στ = Iα
α = mbgsinθ / mpr2
Would this be a correct approach?
 
vetgirl1990 said:
I'm thinking using Στ = Iα
Correct, this is the torque equation for the pulley and it involves the angular acceleration which you are looking for.

vetgirl1990 said:
Where the y-component of the block's gravity (mgsinθ) causes the torque (ie. the pulley to spin), and I = mr2

It is not the block's gravity which causes the torque, it is the tension in the string. Because the block also accelerates, these two quantities will not be the same. The tension is an unknown which you will also have to solve for. Also note that the moment of inertia of a disk of mass m and radius r is not given by ##I = mr^2##.
 
Orodruin said:
It is not the block's gravity which causes the torque, it is the tension in the string. Because the block also accelerates, these two quantities will not be the same. The tension is an unknown which you will also have to solve for. Also note that the moment of inertia of a disk of mass m and radius r is not given by ##I = mr^2##.

Great, thank you -- this helps a lot! Instead, I'm using I = 1/2MR2. This is the moment of inertia for a disk.

One more thing... I know this is a pretty general question, but how do you properly identify the force that causes torque? Is it just finding the force that is directly connected to the rotating object's axis?
The reason why I thought the block's gravity caused torque was because it's the weight of the block that causes it to slide down the ramp, which therefore turns the pulley.
 
vetgirl1990 said:
One more thing... I know this is a pretty general question, but how do you properly identify the force that causes torque? Is it just finding the force that is directly connected to the rotating object's axis?
The reason why I thought the block's gravity caused torque was because it's the weight of the block that causes it to slide down the ramp, which therefore turns the pulley.
It is a common source of error to take an object as somehow experiencing a force to which it is not directly exposed. It is important to consider each object in quite a blinkered manner, only subject to forces that act on it directly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vetgirl1990
haruspex said:
It is a common source of error to take an object as somehow experiencing a force to which it is not directly exposed. It is important to consider each object in quite a blinkered manner, only subject to forces that act on it directly.

I'm taking a second look at this problem, and stuck on one part. I've figured out my net force and torque equations to be:

∑Fy = N - mgcosθ = 0 --> N = mgcosθ EQN 1
∑Fx = mgsinθ - T = ma --> T = mgsinθ - ma = mgsinθ - mrα --> T = m(gsinθ - rα) EQN 2
I still don't know what acceleration is, so I'm expressing it in terms of angular acceleration. a = rα

∑Torque = Iα = Trsinθ + (mgsinθ)rsinθ - Nrsinθ + (mgcosθ)rsinθ
All forces are perpendicular to the axis of rotation, so sinθ=1 and r cancels out... reducing the net equation to:

∑Torque = Iα = T + (mgsinθ) - N + (mgcosθ) EQN 3
Substituting EQN1 and EQN2 into EQN 3 to get rid of tension and normal force...
Iα = m(gsinθ - rα) + (mgsinθ) - (mgcosθ) + (mgcosθ)
(1/2MR2)α = m(gsinθ - rα) + (mgsinθ)

Plugging in all my known values (m=2kg, M=4kg, R=0.5m, θ=53°), I am still getting the wrong answer!
I played around a bit though, and noticed that if I did not express acceleration in terms of angular acceleration in my ∑Fx EQN 2, THEN I get the right answer.

Since the question states that the "block can slide down an incline, BUT connected to a pulley" does this mean that the block is actually not accelerating in the x direction, down the ramp?
 
vetgirl1990 said:
∑Torque = Iα = T + (mgsinθ) - N + (mgcosθ) EQN 3
Same mistake as before. Only include those forces that bear directly on the pulley.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vetgirl1990

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K