Finding Angular Frequency of Small Oscillations about an Equilibrium

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 8K views
Oijl
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a system of one generalized coordinate theta, having the following Lagrangian equation of motion:

r and b are constants
m is mass

(1/3)mb[tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\ddot{\theta}[/tex] = r(r+b)[tex]\theta[/tex] + r[tex]^{2}[/tex][tex]\theta[/tex][tex]^{3}[/tex] + gr[tex]\theta[/tex]

And this potential energy (if it matters):

U = mg(r+b) - mgr[tex]\theta[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex]


There is an equilibrium point where theta is equal to zero.

Find the angular frequency of small oscillations about [tex]\theta[/tex] = 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using the potential energy, can't I just say

U = (1/2)k[tex]\theta[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex]
where
k = 2mgr
so that I can write
[tex]\omega[/tex] = (k/m)^(1/2)
[tex]\omega[/tex] = (2gr)^(1/2)
and call that the angular frequency?

But the problem asks me to do it the Lagrangian way.

So
[tex]\omega[/tex] = (2[tex]\pi[/tex])/[tex]\tau[/tex]

How can I find tau?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oijl said:
Using the potential energy, can't I just say

U = (1/2)k[tex]\theta[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex]
where
k = 2mgr
so that I can write
[tex]\omega[/tex] = (k/m)^(1/2)
[tex]\omega[/tex] = (2gr)^(1/2)
and call that the angular frequency?

Clever, but it's not right. You can see this by comparing the units of U=(1/2)kx^2 with those of U = (1/2)k[tex]\theta[/tex][tex]^{2}[/tex]: both U's have the same unit, both x doesn't have the same unit as theta, so the two k's must have different units. That means the equation omega=(k/m)^1/2 is not correct.

To start, do you know the characteristic differential equation for simple harmonic motion? Try to get the Lagrangian equation of motion into that form, remembering that theta^3 is much smaller than theta for small values of theta.