Finding Coefficient of x^25 in (2x - (3/x^2))^58

Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I get a number that is too big when I calculate the coefficient of x^25 in:

(2x - (3/x^2))^58

This is how I found the coefficient:

Code:
Note that (58) = A combination value...
           k

(58) * (2x)^(58-k) * (-3/x^2)^k
 k
(58) * (2)^(58 - k) * (x)^(58 - k) * (-3)^k * (1/x^2)^k
 k
(58) * (2)^(58 - k) * (-3)^k * (x)^(58 - k) * (x)^-2k
 k
(58) * (2)^(58 - k) * (-3)^k * (x)^(58 - 3k)
 k

58 - 3k = 25
-3k = -33
k = 11

So:

(58) * 2^47 * (-3)^11 * (x)^25
 11

This comes out to be a gigantic number. So I am unsure whether it is anywhere close to being correct despite that I thought that I followed the steps correctly. : \
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thats the right answer; -5676647367067636376814212874240
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top