Finding Coordinates of Partial Arc Radius Without Sine and Cosine Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fergus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
To find the x and y coordinates of a partial arc radius without sine and cosine functions, users can utilize approximations for sine and cosine based on Taylor series. For angles less than 30 degrees, the approximation sin(x) = x (in radians) yields less than 5% error, while a more refined approximation provides up to 0.1% error. The discussion also highlights the challenges of working with angles in different quadrants when using polar forms of complex numbers. Users are encouraged to explore resources like Taylor series and CORDIC algorithms for more accurate calculations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of mathematical approximations in programming for CNC applications.
Fergus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I think this falls under the stuff I've forgotten file. We're writting a program for the CNC lathe and I need to find x and y coordinates of a partial arc radius given the angle. This trick is the controller doesn't have sine and cosine funcitonality. I'm sure this is a basic definition thing I learned in trig in High School, unfotunately the 15 years since then have killed that memory. Help?

Thanks,
Mike
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You probably just need x^2 + y^2 = r^2
 
I looked at that but I'm going to need more. Basically we want the user to input the angle. The Pythagorean theorum gets me one equation and two unknowns, I need to come up with another equation or be able to use something to generate the sine ratio without using the sine funciton.
 
Sine is pretty easy to approximate.

If the angle is less that 30 degrees then the approximation,

sin(x) = x, with x in radians ( equiv to sin(x) = x*pi/180 with x in degrees),

will get you less than 5% error.

If you want better use sin(x) = x - x^3 / 6 (equiv to six(x) = x*pi/180 - (x*pi/180)^3 / 6 with x in degrees) will get you approx 1% max error if x is less than 60 degrees and better than 0.1% max error if x is less than 30 degrees.
 
Last edited:
Yep wat uart said was 100% correct, and for the cosine function you may want to use cos(x) = \pi - (x*\pi/180)^{2}/2 with similar accuracy. for more accuracy just add ...+ (x*\pi/180)^{4}/24
 
When evaluating the polar form of complex numbers I hate dealing with angles in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th quadrants.
 
Thanks for the help! I actually just stumbled on a site showing how to use a Tayor series to estimate sine and cosine ([w__.homeschoolmath.net/teaching/sine_calculator.php) and how calculators etc. use a CORDIC algorithm to caclutate the value. Guess it wasn't actually a simple thing I forgot. Of course then I went back to one of my old math books and there it was. Thanks again!

Mike
 

Similar threads

Back
Top