Finding current ia using mesh and nodal analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter DFrentzen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mesh Nodal
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 2K views · last reply
DFrentzen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Circuit schematic with a 6 V source, resistors of 2 kΩ, 1 kΩ and 2 kΩ, a 2 kΩ resistor on top right, a dependent voltage source 2v1 on the right, labelled v1 and ia.


Given the circuit diagram above, I am interested in finding the current ia. Using mesh analysis, I determined it to be 1.71mA, but nodal analysis results in a value of 2.25mA. Solution attempts provided below. I think the issue is in my nodal analysis approach.

Mesh Analysis..I1 is the left mesh, I2 the right mesh.
Handwritten mesh and nodal analysis working in three boxed steps, with expansions, isolations and substitutions, ending with I1 - I2 = 0.0017143.


Nodal analysis attempt...current calculation at the bottom.
Handwritten algebra steps: (v-6)/4000 + v/1000 + (v-2(6-v))/4000 = 0, expanded to 0.002v - 9/2000 = 0, isolated to v = 9/4, then v/1000 = 0.00225 after substitution.
 
Attachments
  • Screenshot of a textbook page showing circuit problems 33 and 34, with three resistor-and-source circuits labelled with voltages and resistances and a Thevenin equivalent circuit diagram for problem 34.
    upload_2016-2-8_15-47-31.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
For the node equation, check your substitution for v1: Note that the 6 V source is connected through a resistor to the reference potential.
 
I tried to take that into account on one of my attempts, the voltage v1 as 3-v provides the correct value for current. I was unsure if I'm on solid ground to do that.

Handwritten algebra: (v - 6)/4000 + v/1000 + (v - (6 - v)2)/4000 = 0, expanded to 0.00175v - 3/1000 = 0, then isolated to v = 1.7143.
 
You're on the right track. But how to justify your substitution?

Consider that you have a term in your node equation for the current that passes through the "v1" resistor. How would you express v1 in terms of that current?
 
gneill said:
You're on the right track. But how to justify your substitution?

Consider that you have a term in your node equation for the current that passes through the "v1" resistor. How would you express v1 in terms of that current?

I see v1 given as

Equation v1 = (6 - v) / (4 x 10^3) x 2 x 10^3, written as a fraction with v1 on the left-hand side.

Which allows me to plug in and

Handwritten algebra solving for v: (v-6)/4000 + v/1000 + (v-v1^2)/4000 = 0, then expanded to -1/2000 v1 + 0.0015v - 3/2000 = 0, substituted to -0.00025(-v+6) + 0.0015v - 3/2000 = 0, expanded to 0.00175v - 0.003 = 0, and isolated to v = 1.7143.