Finding distance by angle of incident

  • Thread starter Thread starter aChordate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the horizontal distance from a lighthouse to a shipwreck, given the height of the lighthouse and the angle of incidence of the light beam. The initial calculations yield a horizontal distance of 110 meters, with further calculations determining the depth-related distance as 15 meters. The total distance from the lighthouse to the shipwreck is found to be 125 meters. It is emphasized that calculations should maintain three significant digits throughout to ensure accuracy. Proper rounding should only occur at the final result.
aChordate
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The light in a lighthouse sits 55 m above sea level. The beam of light strikes the water
at an angle of incidence of 630 and illuminates a shipwreck on the ocean floor. If the
water is 17 m deep, what is the horizontal distance from the lighthouse to the shipwreck?

Homework Equations



tan=opp/adj

n1sinθ1=n2sinθ2

The Attempt at a Solution



tan63=x/55m

x=110m

(1.0)sin(63°)=(1.33)sinθ2

θ2=42

tan(42)=opp/17m
opp=15m

15+110m=125m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aChordate said:

Homework Statement



The light in a lighthouse sits 55 m above sea level. The beam of light strikes the water
at an angle of incidence of 630 and illuminates a shipwreck on the ocean floor. If the
water is 17 m deep, what is the horizontal distance from the lighthouse to the shipwreck?

Homework Equations



tan=opp/adj

n1sinθ1=n2sinθ2

The Attempt at a Solution



tan63=x/55m

x=110m

(1.0)sin(63°)=(1.33)sinθ2

θ2=42

tan(42)=opp/17m
opp=15m

15+110m=125m

Your method is correct, but you do not get the result with three significant digits if you calculate with two digits. The data are given with two digits, use three during the calculations and round off at the end.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top