Finding electric potential with non-uniform charge density?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential from a non-uniform charge density, specifically σ=k*sinθ, on a spherical shell. The potential V is derived using the formula V=1/4πε ∫σ/r da, where the area element da is expressed in spherical coordinates. Key insights include the application of Gauss's law, which indicates that the electric field inside the shell is zero due to the absence of enclosed charge. The use of Green's functions and Legendre polynomials is recommended for solving the integral, particularly referencing Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, for detailed methodologies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and charge density concepts
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of Gauss's law and its implications for electric fields
  • Experience with Green's functions and Legendre polynomials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Green's functions in electrostatics
  • Review Legendre polynomials and their role in potential theory
  • Examine Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, particularly section 3.3
  • Learn about the implications of charge distribution on electric fields and potentials
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physicists dealing with electrostatics, and anyone interested in advanced topics related to electric potential and charge distributions.

solijoli
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
We have a spherical shell. We want to find the electric potential everywhere. Given charge density σ=k*sinθ, k is constant. Also it is wanted from direct integration. V=1/4piε ∫σ/r da. How can we do this, please help?
I thought because it is sphere da is in the direction of r so da=r^2sinθ dθ d(phi) in spherical coordinates but I couldn't solve it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have tried ∫sin² x dx = ½ x − ¼ sin 2x + C?
 
My question is what would be the integral boundaries for Vinside and Voutside. When you just integrate sin^2x dx you just get one result. How can you write for inside and for outside?
 
The electric filed is zero. Gauss theorem. The volume inside does not have a charge. You cannot have a closed surface with a charge inside, ∇ρ=0, because all the charges are distributed on the surface. That's the reason why the electric field inside a metal is zero. But the potential is cte or zero. It is the same from the physical point of view
 
There is an expansion of the Green's function in terms of Legendre polynomials. You could use that. If that doen't work, then you could use the expansion of the Green's function in terms of spherical harmonics. Refer chapter 3 of Jackson, 3rd edition, in particular, section 3.3 .
Since this problem has azimuthal symmetry, you may also want to have a look at equation 3.33 in Jackson and apply the boundary conditions that the potential is zero at infinity and should be finite at zero.
@ cabrera:
woudn't agree with you as:
1) Nothing mentioned in the problem specifies that it is a metal.
2) Charge density does not have spherical symmetry.
 
Last edited:
physwizard, I meant inside the shell. The field should zero,shouldn't it?
 
cabrera said:
physwizard, I meant inside the shell. The field should zero,shouldn't it?

no, not with a non-conducting shell. The charges don't move around on a non-conductor.

Suggest that we move this to the homework forum and follow the rules there?
 
If the charge density was uniform, wouldn't the potential inside be equal to the potential of the surface? V=1/4pi epsilon * Q/R . But in this case the charge density is not uniform. Also it is a conducting shell so i think the electric field inside should be zero because of gauss law, there is no q enclosed since all the q is on surface then field=0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K