MHB Finding Equilibrium Solutions & Stability of $(1)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equilibrium solutions and analyzing their stability for the system defined by the equations. The only equilibrium solution identified is (0,0), which is determined by setting the derivatives to zero. The Jacobi matrix at this point is calculated, revealing eigenvalues with negative real parts, indicating that the equilibrium is asymptotically stable. Participants also explore the behavior of solutions as time approaches infinity, concluding that solutions near (0,0) converge to this point. Overall, the analysis confirms that (0,0) is an asymptotically stable equilibrium solution.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to find the equilibrium solutions and determine their stability.

$(1)\left\{\begin{matrix}
\dot{x}=-y-x(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2\\
\dot{y}=x-y(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2
\end{matrix}\right.$

I also want to check the behavior of the solutions of $(1)$ when $t \to \infty$. There are four possible answers.

  1. there exists exactly one equilibrium solution and it is asymptotically stable. Furthermore, $\forall$ solution $(x,y)$ of $(1)$ we have that $\lim x(t)=x_0$ and $\lim y(t)=y_0$ where $(x_0,y_0)$ equilibrium solution.
  2. there exists exactly one equilibrium solution and it is asymptotically stable. Furthermore, $\forall$ solution $(x,y)$ of $(1)$ we have that $\lim x(t) \neq x_0$ and $\lim y(t) \neq y_0$ where $(x_0,y_0)$ equilibrium solution.
  3. $\exists$ exactly one equilibrium solution and it is stable but not asymptotically stable. Also $\forall$ solution $(x,y) \neq (x_0, y_0)$ of $(1)$ we have that $\lim x(t) \neq x_0$ and $\lim y(t) \neq y_0$ where $(x_0,y_0)$ is the equilibrium solution.
  4. $\exists$ exactly one equilibrium solution and it is stable but not asymptotically stable. Also $\forall$ solution $(x,y) \neq (x_0, y_0)$ of $(1)$ with $x^2(0)+y^2(0)>1$ we have that $x^2(t)+y^2(t) \geq 1$.
  5. $\exists$ exactly one equilibrium solution and it is unstable. $\forall$ other solution $(x,y)$ of $(1)$ we have that $\lim (x^2(t)+y^2(t))=1$.
I have thought the following so far.In order to find the equilibrium solutions, we set $\dot{x}=0$ and $\dot{y}=0$.

$\dot{x}=0 \Rightarrow -y-x (1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2=0 (\star)$

and

$\dot{y}=0 \Rightarrow x-y (1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2=0 \Rightarrow x=y(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2$

$(\star): -y-y(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^4=0 \Rightarrow y=0 \text{ or } 1+(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^4=0, \text{ which is rejected}$.

So $y=0$ and $x=0$.So $(0,0)$ is the only equilibrium solution.

If we set $f_1(x,y)=-y-x(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2$ and $f_2(x)=x-y(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2$, then we have

$\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}=-(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2+\frac{2x^2(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}$.Is this right?

Because in order to determine the stability, we compute the Jacobi matrix at the equilibrium solution, but $\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}(0,0)$ is not defined.

Am I doing something wrong? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
So $(0,0)$ is the only equilibrium solution.

If we set $f_1(x,y)=-y-x(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2$ and $f_2(x)=x-y(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2$, then we have

$\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}=-(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})^2+\frac{2x^2(1-\sqrt{x^2+y^2})}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}$.

Is this right?

Because in order to determine the stability, we compute the Jacobi matrix at the equilibrium solution, but $\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}(0,0)$ is not defined.

Am I doing something wrong?

Hey evinda!

$\pd {f_1}x$ is a limit isn't it?
More specifically:
$$\pd {f_1}x(0,0)=\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(0+h,0)-f(0,0)}{h} = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{-h(1-\sqrt{h^2})^2-0}{h}=-1$$
(Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey evinda!

$\pd {f_1}x$ is a limit isn't it?
More specifically:
$$\pd {f_1}x(0,0)=\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(0+h,0)-f(0,0)}{h} = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{-h(1-\sqrt{h^2})^2-0}{h}=-1$$
(Thinking)

Ah yes... Then we have

$$\pd {f_1}x(0,0)=-1 \\ \pd {f_1}y(0,0)=-1 \\ \pd {f_2}x(0,0)=1 \\ \pd {f_2}y(0,0)=-1$$

and thus the Jacobi matrix at $(0,0)$ gets the following form:

$J=\begin{pmatrix}
-1 & -1\\
1 & -1
\end{pmatrix}$, right?

Then we get that the eigenvalues are these ones: $-1 \pm i$ and so $Re(\lambda_1)=Re(\lambda_2)=-1<0$ which implies that the equilibrium is asymptotically unstable.Is the above correct so far? (Thinking)
 
What can we say about the limits $\lim x(t)$ and $\lim y(t)$ where $(x,y)$ any other solution of the problem? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
... and thus the Jacobi matrix at $(0,0)$ gets the following form:

$J=\begin{pmatrix}
-1 & -1\\
1 & -1
\end{pmatrix}$, right?

Then we get that the eigenvalues are these ones: $-1 \pm i$ and so $Re(\lambda_1)=Re(\lambda_2)=-1<0$ which implies that the equilibrium is asymptotically unstable.

That's the correct Jacobian.
But doesn't $Re(\lambda_1)=Re(\lambda_2)=-1<0$ mean that it's stable? (Shake)
After all, the solutions are of the form $\tilde x=\tilde x_0 e^{\pm it} e^{-t}$, which converges doesn't it? (Wondering)

evinda said:
What can we say about the limits $\lim x(t)$ and $\lim y(t)$ where $(x,y)$ any other solution of the problem? (Thinking)

Let's take a look at a streamplot:
View attachment 8409
What does it show us about those limits? (Wondering)

EDIT: Note in particular that solutions close to (0,0) converge.
Therefore (0,0) is asymptotically stable.
 

Attachments

  • streamplot_stability.png
    streamplot_stability.png
    12.7 KB · Views: 132

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
345
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K