Finding Errors in Proof for Baby Rudin Problem 2.7

  • Thread starter Thread starter julypraise
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
julypraise
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've proved that if [itex]B = \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_{i}[/itex] then [itex]\overline{B} = \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} \overline{A_{i}}[/itex] but it should not be right. So could you find errors on my reasoning?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Observe [tex]x \in \overline{B}[/tex]

iff for every [tex]\epsilon>0 \quad B(x;\epsilon) \cap B \neq \emptyset[/tex]

iff [tex]B(x;\epsilon) \cap \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_{i} \neq \emptyset[/tex]

iff [tex]B(x;\epsilon) \cap A_{i_{0}} \neq \emptyset[/tex] for some [itex]i_{0} \in \mathbb{Z}^{+}[/itex]

iff [tex]x \in \overline{A_{i_{0}}}[/tex]

iff [tex]x \in \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} \overline{A_{i}}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your fourth iff is wrong.

it should be if $x \in \bar{A_i_0}$ then $B(x,\epsilon)\cap A_{i_0}$.

I mean if $B(x,\epsilon) \cap A_{i_0}$ \forall \epsilon >0, x can still be outside of A_{i_0}.

Take another set such A_j such that x is in it but not in A_i_0 but they intersect each other, and such that whatever nbhd of x we pick it intersects A_i_0.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Your fourth iff is wrong.

it should be if $x \in \bar{A_i_0}$ then $B(x,\epsilon)\cap A_{i_0}$.

I mean if $B(x,\epsilon) \cap A_{i_0}$ \forall \epsilon >0, x can still be outside of A_{i_0}.

Take another set such A_j such that x is in it but not in A_i_0 but they intersect each other, and such that whatever nbhd of x we pick it intersects A_i_0.

Oh yeah. I think I know what you mean. i_{0} depends on epsilon. Thanks.