Finding f(x) for 0<\lambda<1: Solving for Coefficients a_n and b_n

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtfitzpatrick
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the coefficients \( a_n \) and \( b_n \) for a piecewise function \( f(x) \) defined in two segments based on the parameter \( \lambda \), where \( 0 < \lambda < 1 \). The function is specified for the intervals \( 0 \leq x \leq \lambda \pi \) and \( \lambda \pi \leq x \leq \pi \).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the determination of coefficients \( a_0 \), \( a_n \), and \( b_n \) through integration. There is a question about the correct interpretation of the notation involving \( \lambda \) and \( \pi \). Some participants express uncertainty about the mathematical expressions being used.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring the setup of the problem and questioning the notation. There are attempts to clarify the expressions and confirm the correctness of the initial assumptions regarding the coefficients.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of formatting issues with mathematical symbols, which may affect clarity in communication. The discussion also reflects a need for precision in the definitions and expressions used in the problem.

gtfitzpatrick
Messages
372
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if 0<[tex]\lambda[/tex]<1 and f(x) = x for 0[tex]\leq[/tex]x[tex]\leq[/tex][tex]\lambda\pi[/tex]
and f(x) = ([tex]\lambda[/tex]/1-[tex]\lambda[/tex])([tex]\pi[/tex]-[tex]\lambda[/tex]) for [tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]\pi[/tex][tex]\leq[/tex]x[tex]\leq[/tex][tex]\pi[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
show

f(x)=2/[tex]\pi[/tex](1-[tex]\lambda[/tex]) [tex]\sum[/tex] (sinn[tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]\pi[/tex]sinnx)/n[tex]^{2}[/tex]
 
so am i right a[tex]_{0}[/tex] and a[tex]_{n}[/tex] are both 0

so then is b[tex]_{n}[/tex] = 1/[tex]\pi[/tex] [tex]\int^{\lambda\pi}_{0}[/tex] xsin(n[tex]\pi[/tex]x/[tex]\pi[/tex]) + 1/[tex]\pi[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]^{\pi}_{\lambda\pi}[/tex] ---- sin(n[tex]\pi[/tex]x/[tex]\pi[/tex])
 
I'm not sure what you're writing here, is it [tex]\lambda \pi[/tex] or [tex]\lambda^{\pi}[/tex] ?
 
its ([tex]\lambda[/tex])([tex]\pi[/tex]) not powered or anything, all on the same line but came out funny sometimes, phi seem to move up a bit
 
Use itex instead of tex if you want math symbols to look right in the middle of a line of text.
 
so am i right a[tex]_{o}[/tex] and a[tex]_{n}[/tex] are both 0

so then is b[tex]_{n}[/tex] = 1/[itex]\pi[/itex] [itex]\int^{\lambda\pi}_{0}[/itex] xsin(n[itex]\pi[/itex]x/[itex]\pi[/itex]) + 1/[itex]\pi[/itex] [itex]\int^{pi}_{\lambda\pi}[/itex] ([tex]\lambda[/tex]/1-[tex]\lambda[/tex])([itex]\pi[/itex]-x) sin(n[itex]\pi[/itex]x/[itex]\pi[/itex])

do i work from here?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K