Finding general solution to a differential equation using power series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the general solution to the differential equation y'' - xy' + 2y = 0 using power series, specifically near x = 0. Participants are exploring the nature of the solutions and the validity of their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their attempts at deriving the solution, including the use of power series and the implications of specific terms in the series. Questions arise regarding the correctness of coefficients and the relationships between terms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts and identifying potential mistakes. Some participants are questioning the necessity of a closed form expression and suggesting alternative approaches to recognize patterns in the series.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of differing methods in textbooks, with some participants expressing frustration over the lack of clarity in their own resources. Additionally, there are constraints regarding the assumptions made about the coefficients in the power series.

s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Find the general solution near x = 0 of y'' - xy' + 2y = 0 (using power series).

Answer:
y = a_0 * y_1(x) + a_1 * y_2(x)
where
y_1(x) = 1 - x^2 and y_2(x) = x - 1/6 * x^3 - 1/120 x^5 - 1/1680 * x^7 - ...


Homework Equations


Power series. Sigma notation for summations. Polynomial derivatives.


The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is attached. I get y(x) = ke^x and I think I'm wrong but I'm not sure since the answer my book gives doesn't use sigma notation.

I'd appreciate if someone could tell me if I'm right or wrong and if I am wrong, where I went wrong.
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • MyWork.jpg
    MyWork.jpg
    70.4 KB · Views: 1,435
Physics news on Phys.org
I see two mistakes. First, the non-zero an of the second solution aren't given by -a1/n! for n>1. Second, even if that were the case, your solution wouldn't be ex because the sign of the first term the series is wrong.

Try calculating a7 explicitly using the recurrence relation.
 
I get a_7 = 1/14 * a_5 = 1/14 * -1/120 * a_1 = -1/1680 * a_1 and I see that the a_n = -1/n! a_1 does not work out for that particular case.

I also see that a_n = -1/n! does not hold for the zero values.

As for the sign of the first term for the e^x part, I didn't understand what you meant. Could you rephrase that please?

I would appreciate it if you could tell me what the explicit relationship is and what the reasoning was in order to get it because my book doesn't cover the material in this way and uses another method which I dislike (the no summation notation, "dot dot dot" method).
 
I see more mistakes now that I'm awake. They're easy to see if you just compare the two series. Your solution was
$$y_2(x) = a_1\left(x - \frac{x^3}{6} - \frac{x^5}{120} - \frac{x^7}{1680} - \cdots\right)$$ but
$$-a_1 e^x = a_1\left(-1 - x - \frac{x^2}{2} - \frac{x^3}{6} - \cdots \right)$$ What I meant about the sign of the "first" term was the sign of the linear term.
 
Okay, I also redid my work from scratch with neater handwriting and computed up to the a_9 term but I still can't figure out how to get an explicit equation. Namely, how would I take into account that there are zeros for every even subscript from a_4 onward?

I'm currently thinking of something like a_n = [(-1)^n - 1]/2 * 3/n! which works for a_7 and a_9 but not for a_5. I'm still really stuck :(.
 

Attachments

  • MyWork.jpg
    MyWork.jpg
    79.1 KB · Views: 1,236
Why are you insisting on having a closed form expression? Sometimes it's not really possible. Just try writing out more terms and see if you can spot a pattern. It usually doesn't help to simplify as you go because you're looking for a pattern.

Anyway, to get only odd powers, you typically write something like
$$\sin x = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}$$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K