Finding inductor value for same current/voltage phase AC analysis

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
949
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


In the circuit below, what should the value of L be at ω = 10^4 rad/s so that i(t) is in-phase with v(t)?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I am a little uncertain exactly what is meant by i(t) being in phase with v(t). Do I assume that both are cosine functions, and that means that the phase angle for both of them are the same?

I am not sure if I should just divide the phase voltage (unknown phase) by phase current to get the equivalent impedance? I don't know L, so it is a little tough with the expression I have for L to get something. There are no numerical values for the voltage nor current, so I mean how would I even be able to calculate an equivalent impedance with an unknown inductor value.

For one I just said that L is zero for a DC current, but there must be an AC solution as well.
 

Attachments

  • 8.2.png
    8.2.png
    5.5 KB · Views: 584
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my attempt, it looks like you cannot edit a thread using a phone?

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1396932452.217375.jpg
 
Great thanks.

I set 1/j(10^4)(4x10^-6) = j(10^4)L and solve for L, getting -2.5 mH. I know the answer is 2.5 mH, so I am wondering how to get rid of this negative term.
 
I'm not seeing why. Arent they in parallel? That appears to be an addition in series.
 
Maylis said:
Great thanks.

I set 1/j(10^4)(4x10^-6) = j(10^4)L and solve for L, getting -2.5 mH. I know the answer is 2.5 mH, so I am wondering how to get rid of this negative term.

L and C are in parallel so you need to add admittances, not impedances.
So solve jwC + 1/jwL = 0 for L, what do you get?
 
I got 2.5 mH, thank you!