Finding kinetic force and net work

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 123-kg crate being pushed across a horizontal surface by a force at an angle below the horizontal, with the goal of determining the magnitude of that force such that the net work done is zero. The discussion centers around the concepts of forces, friction, and the relationship between applied force and normal force.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss free body diagrams and the forces acting on the crate, including weight, normal force, applied force, and frictional force. There are attempts to calculate the normal force and the frictional force based on the applied force's components. Some participants question the interpretation of the angle of the applied force and its effect on the normal force.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem setup and working through calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the signs of the forces and the need for balance in the equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the final answer yet.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the angle of the applied force and its direction, which affects the calculations of the normal force and frictional force. Participants are also navigating the implications of ensuring that the net work done is zero, which requires careful consideration of the forces involved.

thatgirlyouknow
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 123-kg crate is being pushed across a horizontal floor by a force P that makes an angle of 30.0 ° below the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.270. What should be the magnitude of P, so that the net work done by it and the kinetic frictional force is zero?

Homework Equations



Fcos@=Fnet
F=ma
Fk = k*Fn


The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a free body diagram.

horizontal force--->
|
| crate ^ normal force
v <---- frictional force (coefficient = .27)
weight



The normal force pushing on the crate is 1205.4 N. Multiplying this by the coefficient of kinetic friction gives me 325.46 N for the magnitude of Fk. This is in opposition to the crate's movement, so the horizontal force pushing back is also 325.46 (making the opposing force negative, really). Plugging this into Pcos@ gives a P value of 375.8 N. However, this is incorrect.

To make the net force zero (and therefore the net work zero), they should be opposites of each other, right? So where is the hole in my logic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So my free body diagram didn't come out right.. the far left force (down) is the weight, and the force to the left is the frictional force. Sorry about that.. if confused, draw your own!
 
P is pushing at an angle from below horizontal.

In order for no work to be performed, the frictional force would have to be zero, and the only way that will happen is if the net force of the crate on the floor is zero.

Find the vertical (upward) component of P which is equal to the weight of the crate.
 
The upward component of P is 1205.4, which would make P = 1205/cos30, which is 1391.41 N. Still not correct. Is that what you meant me to find?
 
Do you have a diagram? Before you go too far with this problem, it needs to be clarified whether the pushing force is to the right and downward, or to the right and upward. When the problem says '30 degrees below the horizontal', that can be interperted either way...is it 30 degrees below the negative x axis, which gives it an upward component, or 30 degrees below the positive x axis, which gives it a downwrd component?. In any case, the appied force affects the normal force.
 
It's pushing downward, because that's how all of our problems are set up. The force is above the box and pointing 30 degrees below the horizontal.
 
OK, so now you must calculate the normal force. What are all the forces in the y direction in your FBD? What are they in the x direction?
 
All the forces pushing y-direction: the vertical component of P, the weight of the block, and the normal force.
All x-direction F's: The horizontal component of P and the kinetic frictional force (does this go the x direction? I know static force does...)
 
thatgirlyouknow said:
All the forces pushing y-direction: the vertical component of P, the weight of the block, and the normal force.
All x-direction F's: The horizontal component of P and the kinetic frictional force (does this go the x direction? I know static force does...)
Yes, correct on all counts. Now proceed as you have started, using Newton's law in each direction to solve for P and N.
 
  • #10
so Fn = mg + Psin30
.27*Fn = Fk
Fk = -Pcos30

Fn = 1205.4 +.5P
.27*Fn = Fk
-Pcos30 = 325.458+.135P
-.866P = .135P +325.458
-1.001P = 325.458
P = 325.15 N

Does that look correct and/or is that the result you find? I couldn't decide whether Fk = -Pcos30 or Fk = Pcos30, but since they're inverses, I think I set that one up correctly.
 
  • #11
thatgirlyouknow said:
so Fn = mg + Psin30
.27*Fn = Fk
Fk = -Pcos30

Fn = 1205.4 +.5P
.27*Fn = Fk
-Pcos30 = 325.458+.135P
-.866P = .135P +325.458
-1.001P = 325.458
P = 325.15 N

Does that look correct and/or is that the result you find? I couldn't decide whether Fk = -Pcos30 or Fk = Pcos30, but since they're inverses, I think I set that one up correctly.
Almost, but you let the minus sign get the best of you. Since the horizonatl component of the pushing force must be exactly balanced by the friction force in order for no net work to be done, then using Newton 1, Pcos 30 - .27N = 0, or
Pcos30 = +.27N. This is the way you approached it in the y direction when you said that the normal force was equal to the weight plus Psin30...you didn't use a minus sign there for N, so you must be consistent throughout. Your answer is not correct.
 
  • #12
So then .866P - .135P = 325.458
.731P = 325.458
P = 445.22 N

...Better? I didn't think about the total having to equal zero, but now I realize how obvious that is.
 
  • #13
thatgirlyouknow said:
So then .866P - .135P = 325.458
.731P = 325.458
P = 445.22 N

...Better? I didn't think about the total having to equal zero, but now I realize how obvious that is.
Yes, nice job.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K