Finding Local Min/Max: Second Derivative Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter eurekameh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding local minima and maxima using the second derivative test in multivariable calculus, specifically focusing on the conditions under which critical points are identified and classified.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the second derivative test, particularly the scenarios when D = 0 and fxx = 0. Questions arise regarding how to analyze these cases further to determine the nature of critical points.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the D = 0 case, suggesting that it requires closer examination and drawing parallels to single-variable calculus. There is an acknowledgment of the need for additional checks in two dimensions, but no consensus has been reached on specific methods for resolving these cases.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the limitations of first multivariate courses in discussing the D = 0 scenario, indicating that participants may be working within certain educational constraints. Additionally, a note about forum etiquette regarding post "bumping" has been raised.

eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
So we first find where fx(x,y) = 0 and fy(x,y) = 0, where fx and fy are the partial derivatives of z = f(x,y). Once we find those critical points, we use D = (fxx)(fyy) - (fxy)^2.
If D > 0 and fxx > 0, we have a local min at that point.
If D > 0 and fxx < 0, we have a local max at that point.
If D < 0, we have a saddle point.
If D = 0, no information can be found using the second derivative test.

My question is:
1. How do we deal with the D = 0 situation? How would we find if that point's a max or min?
2. What if fxx = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump'd/
 
The D = 0 case has to be examined more closely, but the means for doing that are not usually discussed in a first multivariate course.

It is analogous to what happens in single-variable calculus. If both f'(a) and f''(a) equal zero, it could mean that there is a point of inflection at x = a [e.g., x = 0 for f(x) = x3 ], but there could also be a very flat maximum or minimum there [as with x = 0 for f(x) = x4 ] .

What do you check? If there is a change of concavity at x = a (that is, the sign of f''(x) changes as x passes through a ) , then there is a point of inflection there. If the concavity does not change, x = a is an extremum.

You would need to do something comparable for z = f(x,y) , but now you have to make checks in two dimensions. (Imagine the fun you can have with functions of even more variables...)[Oh, and please don't 'bump' posts in PF; it doesn't get attention any faster, it just confuses the process of having Helpers check for threads needing help. (It raises the reply count and makes it look like the thread has already been getting help...)]
 
If f_{xx}= 0 then D\le 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K