Finding magnitude of electrostatic force

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electrostatic force between two collinear particles and the confusion surrounding the component method versus the direct formula. It highlights that the components of force in the x and y directions must be derived correctly to match the result from the direct formula kq1q2/[(y2-y1)² + (x2-x1)²]. A key point is that using the differences in coordinates incorrectly can lead to undefined components, particularly if both charges are aligned along the same axis. The correct approach involves using the angle between the connecting line and the axes to find the components accurately. Understanding this method clarifies why direct calculation is often simpler and ensures consistent results.
transmini
Messages
81
Reaction score
1
We have a question about finding the electrostatic force acting on a particle from another particle. They are colinear since there is only the 2 particles, but not along an axis.

My question is, why does finding the force in the x direction and finding the force in the why direction, then doing

√(Fx2 + Fy2) not give me the same answer as if I did

kq1q2/ [(y2-y1)2 + (x2-x1)2]?

I'm new to typing on here also so I'm not quite sure about complete formatting yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transmini said:
My question is, why does finding the force in the x direction and finding the force in the why direction, then doing

√(Fx2 + Fy2) not give me the same answer as if I did

kq1q2/ [(y2-y1)2 + (x2-x1)2]?

It should give the the same answer if you found Fx and Fy correctly.

However, it is easier to find the force directly using kq1q2/ [(y2-y1)2 + (x2-x1)2]
 
TSny said:
It should give the the same answer if you found Fx and Fy correctly.

However, it is easier to find the force directly using kq1q2/ [(y2-y1)2 + (x2-x1)2]

My guess would be I didn't find them correctly then. I used the formula for electrostatic force, except for r2, I used (x2-x1)2 and did a similar thing for the y direction
 
transmini said:
My guess would be I didn't find them correctly then. I used the formula for electrostatic force, except for r2, I used (x2-x1)2 and did a similar thing for the y direction
That's not the correct way to get the components. To convince yourself of that, suppose the two charges were both on the y-axis. What would you get for the x-component of the force if you used (x2-x1)2 for r2?
 
TSny said:
That's not the correct way to get the components. To convince yourself of that, suppose the two charges were both on the y-axis. What would you get for the x-component of the force if you used (x2-x1)2 for r2?

We would end up with 0, making the component undefined, which wouldn't make sense. So why it doesn't work makes sense now, but how would you go about finding the components, despite finding the magnitude first being easier?
 
Last edited:
The force is parallel to the line connecting the particles. The angle θ that the force makes to the x-axis is the same as the angle that the connecting line makes to the x axis.

So, ##\cos\theta = \frac{x_2-x_1}{r}## and ##F_x = F \cos\theta = \frac{kq_1q_2 (x_2-x_1)}{r^3}##

Similarly for the y component.
 
Okay, I see where that comes from now and that makes sense as well. Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
789
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K