Finding Mass of Isotope After Radioactive Decay by Half-Life

AI Thread Summary
A radioactive sample of 2.25g with a half-life of 3.8 days will decay over time, and the calculation for remaining mass after 11.0 days is discussed. The user initially calculated the mass after two half-lives, resulting in 0.5625g, and recognized that 11.0 days is slightly less than three half-lives. Using the formula 2.25g × (1/2)^(11/3.8), the user found the remaining mass to be approximately 0.303g after rounding to three significant figures. The final answer was confirmed as correct. Understanding the half-life concept is essential for solving similar problems in nuclear chemistry.
rakeru
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A radioactive sample contains 2.25g of an isotope with a half-life of 3.8 days.
How much of the isotope in grams will remain after 11.0 days?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Hi! I've just started college this semester. I'm taking Introductory Chemistry. Right now we are doing nuclear chemistry. This problem is confusing, though, because I'm not sure if I can just divide the half-life like a normal number.. My professor doesn't teach. Literally.

I tried doing this problem this way:

It starts off with 2.25g.
After 3.8 days (one half-life) it's 1.125g.
After 7.6 days (two half lives) it's 0.5625g.
But in another half-life, 11.4 days would have passed. More than 11. In 11.4 days it would be 0.28125g.

Is this correct? How would I calculate this? My book doesn't tell me.. Is there a specific way? It only tells me that it's "beyond the scope of this book". Please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi rakeru! welcome to pf! :smile:
rakeru said:
It starts off with 2.25g.
After 3.8 days (one half-life) it's 1.125g.
After 7.6 days (two half lives) it's 0.5625g.
But in another half-life, 11.4 days would have passed. More than 11. In 11.4 days it would be 0.28125g.

in other words, after 3.8n days it's 2.25 times 1/2n

so after n days it's 2.25 times 1/2n/3.8

so you need to find 211/3.8 :wink:
 
Hi!

So I was looking up similar questions previously and it turns out that one person said the same thing as you.

I tried it first with others just in case and it worked. :D

I did: 2.25g × 1/211/3.8

And I got 0.302537977g.

The question had also told me to give the answer in three significant figures so: 0.303g, right?

Uhm, I hope it works! I'm going to submit my answer now.. :) Thank you so much!
 
hi rakeru! :smile:
rakeru said:
I did: 2.25g × 1/211/3.8

And I got 0.302537977g.

The question had also told me to give the answer in three significant figures so: 0.303g, right?

yup, looks fine! :smile:
 
Yup! I got it right :) Thank you.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top