Finding mimum of a function with 2 local mins

  • Thread starter Thread starter daviddoria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Local
daviddoria
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I have a function that looks like this:
http://rpi.edu/~doriad/view1.jpg The function is non analytic, so I have to use something like the steepest descent method with numerical gradients to find the minimum. However, if my starting point is on the left of the tall peak, the min I find is on the left side (clearly) and if I choose the starting point to be on the right side I find the low point on the right. Clearly in this case I could just do both and take the smaller one, but if I'm not sure about the location of the tall peak to start with, I can't simply choose a starting point on either side. Is there a way to find the actual lowest point consistently?

Thanks,

David
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi David,

I think it would be a lot better if you could provide an image of the function to make it all much more clear.
 
The image has been posted.
Bump!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top