Finding net charge on a sphere's surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net charge on the surface of a sphere based on the electric field at a certain distance from it. Participants are examining the relationship between the electric field and charge, particularly focusing on the implications of sign conventions and units in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for electric field and its application to find charge, questioning the correctness of signs and units in their calculations. There is also a consideration of how the homework platform might be interpreting the answer.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the numerical correctness of the original poster's calculations but have raised concerns about the sign and unit of the answer. There is an ongoing exploration of potential issues with the homework platform's requirements and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the possibility of entering the answer in different units, such as nanocoulombs (nC), and are questioning the instructions provided by the homework platform.

archaic
Messages
688
Reaction score
214
Homework Statement
We have a thin spherical shell with a spherically symmetric negative charge distribution inside. The radius of the shell is ##R=0.705\,m##, and the electric field strength at its surface is ##E=867\,N/C## everywhere, and is pointing radially toward the center of the sphere.
What is the net charge within the sphere's surface?
Relevant Equations
.
The electric field caused by the surface distribution on a point ##a## meters far from it is$$E(a)=\frac{kQ}{(R+a)^2}$$from which I get$$Q=\frac{(R+a)^2E(a)}{k}=\frac{(R)^2E(0)}{k}=\frac{(0.705)^2\times867}{8.99\times10^9}\approx4.79\times10^{-8}$$and I take its negative because the direction of the field is inwards.
I'm being told that this is wrong, though. Have I misunderstood the question, or approached it incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Your answer is numerically correct. (I would use a simple '=' sign though.) Your answer is missing the minus sign and unit.

You should use E(0) = -867N/C (radial sign convention), then you get the missing minus sign in the answer. And never forget units!
 
Steve4Physics said:
Hi. Your answer is numerically correct. (I would use a simple '=' sign though.) Your answer is missing the minus sign and unit.

You should use E(0) = -867N/C (radial sign convention), then you get the missing minus sign in the answer. And never forget units!
Thank you! Yes, I know about the negative sign. ;)
archaic said:
and I take its negative
Are you sure, though? This answer is being rejected in my HW platform.
 
Hi. Sounds like the HW platform may have a bug or incorrect answer (it happens). Have you tried entering the (incorrect) value without a minus sign? Have you checked any other instructions - e.g. maybe you are meant to enter the answer in nC. Sorry, can't think of anything else.
 
Steve4Physics said:
maybe you are meant to enter the answer in nC
Yes... :DD:DD:DD
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K