Finding Normal Vector and Tangent Plane at a Given Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the normal vector and the equation of the tangent plane to a surface defined by a logarithmic function at a specific point, as well as exploring a second surface defined by a spherical equation. Participants are attempting to clarify their understanding of the mathematical principles involved in these problems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of formulas for normal vectors and tangent planes, questioning their numerical substitutions and results. There is an exploration of the implications of different approaches to defining surfaces and their gradients. Some participants express confusion over the geometric significance of manipulating equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and corrections to each other's numerical results. There is recognition of different methods to find normal vectors, and some participants are questioning the validity of their approaches while others offer alternative perspectives. No consensus has been reached, but there is a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential errors in their calculations and assumptions regarding the surfaces in question. There is mention of homework constraints that may limit the approaches taken, as well as the need to adhere to specific mathematical definitions and properties.

charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0
help me find this normal vector!

Homework Statement



Find a normal vector n and the equation of the tangent plane to the surface S at the point x0

S: z=ln(x2+3y2)

x0=(2,-1,ln7)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



ok so I have this general formula from the textbook.

z= z0+Fx(x0,y0)(x-x0)+Fy(x0,y0)(y-y0)

and n=(Fx(x0,y0) , Fy(X0,Y0) , -1) respectively.

so using these

S: z= ln(x2+3y2)

let u=x2+3y2

z=ln(u)

dz/du=(1/u) (u')

Fx(x,y) = d/dx(u)/u = 2x/(x2+3y2) = 4

Fy = d/dy (u)/u = 6y/ (x2+3y2) = -6

z= ln7 + 4(x-2)-6(y+1)

z= ln7 +4x -6y -14

ln7 +4x -6y -14 -z = 0

so n =(4,-6,-1)T

but they have 4x-6y-7z-14+7ln7=0

and n= (4, -6, -7)T

?? I am not sure what I have done wrong but it looks very close to what they have.

any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


charmedbeauty said:
Fx(x,y) = d/dx(u)/u = 2x/(x2+3y2) = 4

Fy = d/dy (u)/u = 6y/ (x2+3y2) = -6
Check your numerical results of the substitution of x0,y0 here. :)
 


uart said:
Check your numerical results of the substitution of x0,y0 here. :)

ohh no (-1)2≠-1.

Thanks a bunch uart!
 


Do you think you could give me a hint in the right direction for this one?

z2+x2+y2=1

x0=(1/3 , 1/2, √23/ 6)

If I do it the usual way and I solve for z, I get a negative sqrt term so I don't think that is the right approach.

there is some inequalities I can see but I don't think that helps
I think its a sphere but that doesn't really help me either.

please help. Thanks.
 


If [itex]z^2+ x^2+ y^2= 1[/itex] then [itex]z= \pm\sqrt{1- x^2- y^2}[/itex]. That is not a "negative squareroot" it simply means that [itex]x^2+ y^2[/itex] cannot be larger than 1. And that must be true geometrically because this is the surface of a sphere of radius 1.

But it is not necessary to solve for z. If a surface is given by F(x, y, z)= constant, then the gradient, [itex]\nabla F[/itex] is a normal vector at each point on the surface. Here [itex]F(x, y, z)= x^2+ y^2+ z^2[/itex] so that [itex]\nabla F= 2x\vec{i}+ 2y\vec{j}+ 2z\vec{k}[/itex]. At the given point, that is [itex](2/3)\vec{i}+ \vec{j}+ \sqrt{34}/3\vec{j}[/itex] so the tangent plane at that point is [itex](2/3)(x- 1/3)+ (y- 1/2)+ \sqrt{34}{3}(z- \sqrt{34}/6)= 0[/itex].
 


HallsofIvy said:
If [itex]z^2+ x^2+ y^2= 1[/itex] then [itex]z= \pm\sqrt{1- x^2- y^2}[/itex]. That is not a "negative squareroot" it simply means that [itex]x^2+ y^2[/itex] cannot be larger than 1. And that must be true geometrically because this is the surface of a sphere of radius 1.

But it is not necessary to solve for z. If a surface is given by F(x, y, z)= constant, then the gradient, [itex]\nabla F[/itex] is a normal vector at each point on the surface. Here [itex]F(x, y, z)= x^2+ y^2+ z^2[/itex] so that [itex]\nabla F= 2x\vec{i}+ 2y\vec{j}+ 2z\vec{k}[/itex]. At the given point, that is [itex](2/3)\vec{i}+ \vec{j}+ \sqrt{34}/3\vec{j}[/itex] so the tangent plane at that point is [itex](2/3)(x- 1/3)+ (y- 1/2)+ \sqrt{34}{3}(z- \sqrt{34}/6)= 0[/itex].

ok I think that should be a √23 /6 not √34 /6

but that is a really convenient way of doing that. thanks a lot.

but for some reason in their answer they have multiplied it by three i.e.


2x +3y+√23z -6 = 0

does this not change the normal vector in a geometric way?

since they have n=(2,3,√23)T

and not n=(2/3,1,√23 /3)T

??

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K