Finding Quartic Roots Without Knowing One Factor

  • Thread starter Thread starter BloodyFrozen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
Finding quartic roots without knowing one factor can involve checking for "nice" quadratic factors, which can be expressed in a specific form. The discussion highlights that if the quartic has such factors, one can derive a system of equations by comparing coefficients after expanding the assumed factorization. However, not all quartics yield solutions for these equations, as demonstrated with different quartic examples. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying the existence of rational roots and the implications of having no solutions in the derived systems. Ultimately, the method can be lengthy but provides a structured approach to solving quartic equations.
BloodyFrozen
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
Is there a method to finding the roots of quartics besides Ferrari's formula?

I have the equation

x^{4}+5x^{2}+4x+5=0

I know one of the factor is something like $$x^{2}+x+1$$ and the other one can be found using sythetic division, but how can I find the factors without knowing one of them in the first place?

Thanks.

My bad about the title. It's supposed to be Quartics instead of uartics.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the quartic has "nice" quadratic factors, then they will be of the form:

x^4+5x^2+4x+5\equiv (x^2+ax\pm 1)(x^2+bx\pm 5)

Can you see why this is true? If we expand the right-hand side, we just need to compare coefficients to find the values of a and b and then we should be able to determine the nature of the \pm operator.
 
Mentallic said:
If the quartic has "nice" quadratic factors, then they will be of the form:

x^4+5x^2+4x+5\equiv (x^2+ax\pm 1)(x^2+bx\pm 5)

Can you see why this is true? If we expand the right-hand side, we just need to compare coefficients to find the values of a and b and then we should be able to determine the nature of the \pm operator.

Oh, I see, but how do we know when the factors are "nice"?
 
BloodyFrozen said:
Oh, I see, but how do we know when the factors are "nice"?

We don't. We can always check to see if they are, just like we check to see if there are any rational roots.

With the quartic x^4+5x^2+4x+5 we end up solving a system of equations for a,b that works out nicely, but if we changed the quartic around to say, x^4+6x^2+4x+5 then we find no solutions for a,b in the system of equations.
 
Ok, thanks!
 
Ah, I believe I've seen this before. The method is nice, but it seems a little lengthy. Thanks for the link :smile:
 
Mentallic said:
We don't. We can always check to see if they are, just like we check to see if there are any rational roots.

With the quartic x^4+5x^2+4x+5 we end up solving a system of equations for a,b that works out nicely, but if we changed the quartic around to say, x^4+6x^2+4x+5 then we find no solutions for a,b in the system of equations.

I end up getting two systems but one of them has no solution. Did I proceed correctly?
 
BloodyFrozen said:
I end up getting two systems but one of them has no solution. Did I proceed correctly?

I don't know, what did you get?
 
  • #10
Sorry for not having LATEX since I'm on my phone, but I got:

System 1:

a+b=0
5+1+ab=5
5a+b=4

System 2:

a+b=0
-5-1+ab=5
-5a-b=4
 
  • #11
BloodyFrozen said:
Sorry for not having LATEX since I'm on my phone, but I got:

System 1:

a+b=0
5+1+ab=5
5a+b=4
Right, so simplifying this system, we have

a+b=0
ab=-1
5a+b=4

Which we can then deduce,
a=-b
therefore,
a2=1 -> a=\pm1
4a=4 -> a=1, b=-1
BloodyFrozen said:
System 2:

a+b=0
-5-1+ab=5
-5a-b=4
For this system we have no real solution, so what does that tell you?
 
  • #12
For the second system, I don't get any solutions. Therefore, that can't be the right system.
 
  • #13
BloodyFrozen said:
For the second system, I don't get any solutions. Therefore, that can't be the right system.

Exactly, so what must your factors be?
 
  • #14
Ah, that's what I thought. Thanks!
 
Back
Top