Finding Reactions on a Supported Beam: A Differential Equation Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter yecko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a differential equation related to beam reactions under specific boundary conditions. The equations provided include the fourth derivative of deflection, shear, and moment equations, specifically EI(d^4y/dx^4)=w, EI(d^3y/dx^3)=wx+A, and others. Participants suggest using cantilever deflection equations and removing supports to calculate deflections at specific points. The final solution for the reaction force is determined to be W/28 downwards, with emphasis on proper application of boundary conditions and deflection calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations in structural analysis
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in beam theory
  • Knowledge of cantilever deflection equations
  • Proficiency in calculating shear and moment diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of cantilever beam deflection equations
  • Learn about the application of boundary conditions in structural analysis
  • Research methods for calculating reactions in statically indeterminate beams
  • Explore advanced topics in beam theory, such as the influence of distributed loads
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in analyzing beam reactions and deflections in engineering applications.

yecko
Gold Member
Messages
275
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


螢幕快照 2018-04-21 下午2.37.34.png


Homework Equations


Boundary condition
EI(d^4y/dx^4)=w

The Attempt at a Solution


Boundary condition:
At A, x=0, y=0, slope=0
At C, x=L/2, y=0, shear force = -Rb
At B, x=L, y=0, moment = 0, shear force = 0

I know there are 2 distinctive formulae for A-C and C-B.

For A-C:
Load: EI(d^4y/dx^4)=w -----(1)
Shear:EI(d^3y/dx^3)=wx+A-----(2)
Moment: EI(d^2y/dx^2)=1/2*wx^2+Ax+B-----(3)
EI(dy/dx)=1/6*wx^3+1/6*Ax^2+Bx+C-----(4)
EIy=1/24*wx^4+1/6*Ax^3+1/2*Bx^2+Cx+D-----(5)

However, with this 5 equations, with 4 unknowns, and the boundary conditions, it seems Rb cannot be solved out.
May I know how should I tackle this problem?
Thank you
 

Attachments

  • 螢幕快照 2018-04-21 下午2.37.34.png
    螢幕快照 2018-04-21 下午2.37.34.png
    17.8 KB · Views: 2,427
Physics news on Phys.org
Eeek! Are you familiar with cantilever deflection equations that can be obtained from beam tables? One way to solve this problem is to remove the 2 roller supports and then calculate the beam deflection at those removed supports, then put them back one at a time as a unit load and calculate the deflections at those same points. Ultimately you solve for these reactions knowing that the deflection at the support points is 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PhanthomJay said:
Are u familiar with cantilever deflection equations that can be obtained from beam tables?
Actually no! I can't find any example from our lecture notes or the two recommanded textbooks...
PhanthomJay said:
One way to solve this problem is to remove the 2 roller supports and then calculate the beam deflection at those removed supports, then put them back one at a time as a unit load and calculate the deflections at those same points.
I know the way to deal with deflection with one support, but not two... let me guess...
first consider part A-C, and let it be a free end at C, and calculate the deflection and slope at C. Then, by y=mx, where m= slope at C, in order to calculate the deflection at B.
After finding deflection, by what way can I find the reaction force from the deflection calculated?
Thanks.
 
I don't think I understand the question. If the beam is weightless, won't the deflection be downward just to the left of C, upward to the right of C, and tending to lift at B? If B is just a roller support why will contact be retained?
 
That is a good start. You should be able to find cantilever deflections thru a google search. And if you are familiar with the deflection method for one unknown support reaction, say R_c, then calculate the deflections at each support points in terms of R_c, then just repeat the method for the other unknown support reaction,and add up the total deflections at each support point which each add up to the deflection at that point calculated when the supports were removed. 2 equations with 3 unknowns. A bit tedious however.
 
haruspex said:
I don't think I understand the question. If the beam is weightless, won't the deflection be downward just to the left of C, upward to the right of C, and tending to lift at B? If B is just a roller support why will contact be retained?
True, but the usual assumption is that a roller support can take both upward and downward loads, as if it were on a safety rail like on roller coasters.
 
image.jpg

Should I do it this way?
But as the true deflection at C is 0, should the assumed deflection at B be the difference in deflection between B and C?
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 1,180
Ok, thanks
PhanthomJay said:
True, but the usual assumption is that a roller support can take both upward and downward loads, as if it were on a safety rail like on roller coasters.
 
should the assumed deflection at B be the difference in deflection between B and C?
Thanks
 
  • #10
yecko said:
View attachment 224489
Should I do it this way?
But as the true deflection at C is 0, should the assumed deflection at B be the difference in deflection between B and C?
Thanks
The only assumption you need to make is the one noted by Haruspex, assume roller can take vertical loads in both directions. Otherwise, it does not appear that you are using the tables properly. The slope of the deflected curve at the free ends is given as an an angle theta in radians, and once you know the deflection and angle at C, then the deflection at B is that deflection plus, for small angles, (theta)(L/2). Do the same for the other reaction, calculating deflection at both joints. Then add up the deflections at each point for the 3 cases and set them equal to zero. But you must watch your plus and minus signs.
 
  • #11
3D367454-BB29-408D-93DA-3FE668B80FA4.jpeg

52635064-3390-4305-BE35-96236A921279.jpeg


Am i correct to calculate like this?
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 3D367454-BB29-408D-93DA-3FE668B80FA4.jpeg
    3D367454-BB29-408D-93DA-3FE668B80FA4.jpeg
    33.9 KB · Views: 620
  • 52635064-3390-4305-BE35-96236A921279.jpeg
    52635064-3390-4305-BE35-96236A921279.jpeg
    20.9 KB · Views: 618
  • #12
I held off replying to this until I was satisfied I had the solution. (It is W/28 downwards.)
I didn't use your method. I wrote out the differential equations for the two sections and solved them.

But now I am having trouble following yours, not least for readability.
You seem to have swapped B and C wrt the original diagram (which did assign A, B, C weirdly).
If you can be bothered to repost, typing in your algebra instead of posting an image, I will try to find your error(s). To make it easier, you can substitute L=2, EI=1 and abbreviate the reactions to A, B, C.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
3K