Finding Req - Understanding Professor's Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter zr95
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the professor's method for calculating equivalent resistance (Req) in a circuit. The key point is that resistors can be added in series or parallel based on their connections, and the justification for adding resistors directly is rooted in identifying circuit pathways. The participant expresses confusion about how to recognize series and parallel arrangements quickly without redrawing the circuit. The solution involves understanding that nodes connected by a short circuit allow for simplifying the circuit by combining resistors appropriately. Ultimately, recognizing the circuit's symmetry and connections is crucial for accurate calculations.
zr95
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


upload_2016-9-25_14-53-41.png


Homework Equations


Series: Req = r1 + r2...
Parallel: 1/req = 1/r1 + 1/r2...

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2016-9-25_14-53-26.png

This is my professors solution for the problem and of course without any explanation it doesn't make sense to me. Under what principle can he justify immediately adding 10 + 8?

upload_2016-9-25_14-56-38.png

For my solution I redrew the circuit and did:
5||20 = 4
10+4 = 14

3 || 6 = 2
2+8 = 10

10+14 = 24

Another question: Had I not redrawn the circuit I still would've gotten 14 and 10 but I would've thought they would be in parallel with each other with the way its drawn out?

I understand redrawing it is the easiest way to make sure I have it correct but there won't be enough time unless I immediately recognize what it looks like.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-9-25_14-50-17.png
    upload_2016-9-25_14-50-17.png
    3 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
zr95 said:
Under what principle can he justify immediately adding 10 + 8?

Is there any path that you can draw between a and b (following circuit pathways of course) that does not pass through both the 10 and 8 Ohm resistors? If not, they must be in series between a and b.

zr95 said:
Another question: Had I not redrawn the circuit I still would've gotten 14 and 10 but I would've thought they would be in parallel with each other with the way its drawn out?

I understand redrawing it is the easiest way to make sure I have it correct but there won't be enough time unless I immediately recognize what it looks like.

The trick is to look at the nodes that are bridged by a short circuit. In this circuit nodes c and f are connected together via a wire. That means you are free to move all the connections at one of those nodes to the other node. Symmetry also helps here, as you can put nodes c and f together by "folding" the circuit along a line passing through d-a-b-e. Once you make that fold you've got your parallel resistor connections that you and your professor found, while the two series resistors are left at the fold.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K