Finding Req - Understanding Professor's Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter zr95
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating equivalent resistance (Req) in a circuit using series and parallel resistor formulas. The professor's solution involves directly adding resistances of 10 Ohms and 8 Ohms, justified by the principle that they are in series due to the absence of alternative paths between nodes a and b. The participant's approach, which includes redrawing the circuit and applying the formulas for parallel and series resistances, leads to a total Req of 24 Ohms. The key takeaway is the importance of visualizing circuit pathways to correctly identify series and parallel configurations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series and parallel resistor formulas: Req = r1 + r2 (series) and 1/Req = 1/r1 + 1/r2 (parallel).
  • Basic circuit theory, including concepts of nodes and pathways.
  • Familiarity with circuit redrawing techniques for clarity.
  • Knowledge of Ohm's Law and resistance units (Ohms).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study circuit analysis techniques, focusing on series and parallel resistor combinations.
  • Learn about circuit simplification methods, including redrawing circuits for better visualization.
  • Explore the concept of short circuits and their impact on circuit analysis.
  • Investigate symmetry in circuits and how it can aid in simplifying complex resistor networks.
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of resistor configurations and circuit analysis techniques.

zr95
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


upload_2016-9-25_14-53-41.png


Homework Equations


Series: Req = r1 + r2...
Parallel: 1/req = 1/r1 + 1/r2...

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2016-9-25_14-53-26.png

This is my professors solution for the problem and of course without any explanation it doesn't make sense to me. Under what principle can he justify immediately adding 10 + 8?

upload_2016-9-25_14-56-38.png

For my solution I redrew the circuit and did:
5||20 = 4
10+4 = 14

3 || 6 = 2
2+8 = 10

10+14 = 24

Another question: Had I not redrawn the circuit I still would've gotten 14 and 10 but I would've thought they would be in parallel with each other with the way its drawn out?

I understand redrawing it is the easiest way to make sure I have it correct but there won't be enough time unless I immediately recognize what it looks like.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-9-25_14-50-17.png
    upload_2016-9-25_14-50-17.png
    3 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
zr95 said:
Under what principle can he justify immediately adding 10 + 8?

Is there any path that you can draw between a and b (following circuit pathways of course) that does not pass through both the 10 and 8 Ohm resistors? If not, they must be in series between a and b.

zr95 said:
Another question: Had I not redrawn the circuit I still would've gotten 14 and 10 but I would've thought they would be in parallel with each other with the way its drawn out?

I understand redrawing it is the easiest way to make sure I have it correct but there won't be enough time unless I immediately recognize what it looks like.

The trick is to look at the nodes that are bridged by a short circuit. In this circuit nodes c and f are connected together via a wire. That means you are free to move all the connections at one of those nodes to the other node. Symmetry also helps here, as you can put nodes c and f together by "folding" the circuit along a line passing through d-a-b-e. Once you make that fold you've got your parallel resistor connections that you and your professor found, while the two series resistors are left at the fold.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K