Finding Solutions for Non-Linear Equations and ODEs in Math

  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Finding a function f(x) that satisfies a non-linear ODE or integral equation does not guarantee its existence. While proving that a specific function exists can confirm its validity, the existence of solutions is not assured for all non-linear equations. Existence and uniqueness theorems apply to certain problems, but they do not cover every case. Numerical methods can provide approximate solutions, allowing one to visualize the function and verify its non-zero status. However, an approximate numerical solution does not imply that an exact solution exists.
eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Let,s suppose I'm asked to find a function with certain properties in math, let's call this function f(x), my question is if i find that f(x) must satisfy a certain differential or integral equation let's say:

a(x)f''+b(x)(f')^2 + c(x)tan(f) = 0 (NOn- linear ODE )

x+ f(x)= \int_a ^ b dy log(y^2 +f(x) ) (Non-linear equation)

The question is...does this mean that the function f(x) as a solution of an ODE or a Non-linear integral equation necessarily exist?...:confused: :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand your question. If you mean you have actually have found a function satisfying a given equation, then, yes, it exists!

If you mean you have been asked to find a function satisfying a given equation, then, no, it is not necessarily true that such a function exists. (There are a variety of "existence and uniqueness theorems" that assert that such-and-such problems have solutions. I don't know of any that assert that every non-linear differential equation or every non-linear integral equation has a solution, A perfectly good answer to such a question is "no such function exists" and then, of course, proving there is no such function. Of course, actually finding the function is itself proof that such a function does exist!
 
but the question (from my point of view) would be:

-How could you know that a function satisfying:

x+ f(x) = \int_a ^b dy Log (y^2 +f(x)) exist?...well the question is that you can always use a "Numerical method" ( integration by quadratures, and all that) so you can "draw" a picture of how the function would look like , and you can check that the function exists and it's Non-zero.
 
Except that a numerical solution is at best "approximate". And remember that the approximation is saying that the function given by the numerical solution approximately satisfies the equation. It is quite possible that, even if an equation has an approximate numerical solution, there is no exact solution.
 
eljose said:
but the question (from my point of view) would be:

-How could you know that a function satisfying:

x+ f(x) = \int_a ^b dy Log (y^2 +f(x)) exist?...well the question is that you can always use a "Numerical method" ( integration by quadratures, and all that) so you can "draw" a picture of how the function would look like , and you can check that the function exists and it's Non-zero.

It may be useful the following:

\int dy Log(y^2 + f(x)) = y Log(y^2 + f(x)) - 2 \int dy \frac{y^2}{y^2 + f(x)}

(by parts).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top