Finding splitting field and Galois group questions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding splitting fields and Galois groups for two polynomials. For the polynomial g(x) = x^6 - 10 over Q(c), the splitting field is obtained by adjoining the sixth root of 10 to Q(c), with the Galois group isomorphic to (Z_6,+). In the second question regarding f(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 2 over F_3, participants discuss challenges in constructing the splitting field and suggest that the discriminant of the resulting quadratic may lead to a four-dimensional extension. There is confusion about the use of F_7 and the cyclic nature of the multiplicative group, but participants clarify that -3 and -2 simplify to 0 and 1 in F_3, respectively. The conversation highlights the complexities of determining splitting fields and Galois groups in different polynomial contexts.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


2 questions here:

1)
Let g(x) = x^6 - 10 be a polynomial in Q(c) where c is a primitive 6th root of unity. Find a splitting field for this polynomial and determine it's Galois group

2)
let f(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 2 with coefficients in ##F_3##. Find a splitting field K for this polynomial and determine it's Galois group

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Question 1)
If we adjoin b = the 6th real root of 10 to Q(c) then we have a splitting field. Furthermore, the roots of f will be {b, bc, bc^2, bc^3, bc^4, bc^5}. The Galois group will permute the roots whilst fixing every element of Q(c). So I believe this galois group will be isomorphic to ##(Z_6,+)## where the generator will take b-->bc and fix all elements of Q(c).

Question 2)
I'm having trouble constructing a splitting field for this polynomial. If I assume r is a root and then divide f(x) by x-r I don't seem to arrive at anything helpful. Perhaps I should consider that the multiplicative group in F_7(r) will be cyclic of order 26 (since the degree of r is 3 and 3*9 = 27) so r^27=r, and then use this knowledge to see if any powers of r are also roots. Does this make sense? Does anyone else have any other insights to make this simpler?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PsychonautQQ said:

Homework Statement


2 questions here:

1)
Let g(x) = x^6 - 10 be a polynomial in Q(c) where c is a primitive 6th root of unity. Find a splitting field for this polynomial and determine it's Galois group

2)
let f(x) = x^3 + x^2 + 2 with coefficients in ##F_3##. Find a splitting field K for this polynomial and determine it's Galois group

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Question 1)
If we adjoin b = the 6th real root of 10 to Q(c) then we have a splitting field. Furthermore, the roots of f will be {b, bc, bc^2, bc^3, bc^4, bc^5}. The Galois group will permute the roots whilst fixing every element of Q(c). So I believe this galois group will be isomorphic to ##(Z_6,+)## where the generator will take b-->bc and fix all elements of Q(c).
I think this is correct. Only one remark: you can say ##g(x)## is a polynomial over ##\mathbb{Q}(c)## or in ##\mathbb{Q}(c)[x]##.
Question 2)
I'm having trouble constructing a splitting field for this polynomial. If I assume r is a root and then divide f(x) by x-r I don't seem to arrive at anything helpful. Perhaps I should consider that the multiplicative group in F_7(r) will be cyclic of order 26 (since the degree of r is 3 and 3*9 = 27) so r^27=r, and then use this knowledge to see if any powers of r are also roots. Does this make sense? Does anyone else have any other insights to make this simpler?
I don't understand why you consider ##\mathbb{F}_7## here or even ##\mathbb{Z}_{26}##.
If you divided ##f(x)=x^3+x^2+2## by ##(x-r)## with a root ##r## such that ##r^3+r^2+2=0## then you can also do the rest and split ##f(x)## completely. If I made no mistake, then you will need ##\sqrt{r+1}## in the splitting field. Together with ##r^2## this looks like a four-dimensional extension of ##\mathbb{F}_3## but I didn't check linear dependencies.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
I divided by x-r and then solved the resulting quadratic and calculated that it has a discriminant -3r^2 - 2r + 1. it appears our splitting fields will be a bit different.
 
PsychonautQQ said:
I divided by x-r and then solved the resulting quadratic and calculated that it has a discriminant -3r^2 - 2r + 1. it appears our splitting fields will be a bit different.
I don't think so. ##-3=0## and ##-2=1## in ##\mathbb{F}_3##. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
Ahhh we are such genius's! lol
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K