Finding spring constant and friction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the spring constant (k) in a scenario where a box of mass m, moving with an initial speed v, compresses a spring while overcoming kinetic friction with a coefficient μ on a horizontal surface. Participants explore the application of energy conservation principles and the relationship between kinetic energy, potential energy, and work done by friction.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using a conservation of energy approach to relate the initial kinetic energy, potential energy in the spring, and work done against friction.
  • There is discussion about the need for two equations due to the presence of two unknowns: the spring constant (k) and the compression distance (x).
  • One participant proposes an energy balance equation: (0.5mv^2) + (0.5kx^2) - (µ*nc*x) = 0, but questions the correctness of this formulation.
  • Another participant critiques the initial equation, suggesting that the energy balance should reflect that all initial energy is kinetic and that the spring's potential energy and work done by friction should be accounted for correctly.
  • There is a suggestion to interchange the positions of the kinetic energy and spring potential energy in the equation, indicating that the total energy should equal the spring energy plus the work done by friction when the spring is fully compressed.
  • Participants confirm the final form of the energy balance as 0.5mv^2 - (µ*nc*x) = 0.5kx^2, with some expressing satisfaction with the formulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While there is some agreement on the use of energy conservation principles, participants express uncertainty about the correct formulation of the energy balance equations and the roles of kinetic energy, potential energy, and work done by friction. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the final equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity on the definitions of variables and the conditions under which the energy balance is applied, particularly regarding the compression distance (x) and the work done by friction.

uzman1243
Messages
80
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Josh pushes a box of mass m which then travels on a horizontal surface. There is a coefficient of
kinetic friction μ between the box and the surface. The box has speed v when it reaches x = 0 and
encounters a spring. The box compresses the spring, stops, and then recoils and travels in the opposite direction. When the box reaches x = 0 on its return trip, it stops.
Determine k, the spring constant, in terms of μ, m, g, and v.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


attachment.php?attachmentid=72955&stc=1&d=1410348224.png


is the diagram I have drawn correct?

If it is, I can use F=ma in x & y direction.
However, how can I get V into this equation?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 786
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagram is okay as far as the forces involved. Have you considered a conservation of energy approach?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
gneill said:
Your diagram is okay as far as the forces involved. Have you considered a conservation of energy approach?

Would it go like this:

Intial Kinetic energy + Potential energy (0.5*k*x^2) - work (µ*nc*x) = final kinetic energy (0 as it is in rest in final position)

is this correct? I don't understand the value for x though?
 
Last edited:
You have two unknowns here. One is the spring constant and the other is the compression distance, which is your "x". Having two unknowns implies you'll need two equations, right?

You know what the total energy is to begin with (it's all kinetic and you have the mass and velocity as givens). You should also know what the final energy is and where it's "located". Write energy balance equations for the times when the KE is known to be zero...
 
gneill said:
You have two unknowns here. One is the spring constant and the other is the compression distance, which is your "x". Having two unknowns implies you'll need two equations, right?

You know what the total energy is to begin with (it's all kinetic and you have the mass and velocity as givens). You should also know what the final energy is and where it's "located". Write energy balance equations for the times when the KE is known to be zero...

Is the equation correct though?

(0.5mv^2) + (0.5kx^2) - ((coefficient of frict) * (normal contact) * x) =0

What will the second equation be?
 
uzman1243 said:
Is the equation correct though?

(0.5mv^2) + (0.5kx^2) - ((coefficient of frict) * (normal contact) * x) =0

What will the second equation be?

No, that equation doesn't look correct when the spring compression is x (fully compressed), although it's close. The system starts out with all the energy as KE. That's your 0.5mv^2 term. When the spring is fully compressed the new KE is zero but the spring has stored PE and some energy has been lost due to friction. Write the energy balance accordingly: OLD = NEW. So something like

KEi = PEs + Wf

Where KEi is the initial KE, PEs is the spring PE, Wf is the work done by friction. Use the appropriate expressions for the terms.

Write the second equation for when the block has returned to the starting point from the fully compressed position. For that portion of the trip the initial energy was all stored in the spring as PE, so that's your "OLD" part of the balance. Where's all the "NEW" energy at the end of the trip?
 
gneill said:
No, that equation doesn't look correct when the spring compression is x (fully compressed), although it's close. The system starts out with all the energy as KE. That's your 0.5mv^2 term. When the spring is fully compressed the new KE is zero but the spring has stored PE and some energy has been lost due to friction. Write the energy balance accordingly: OLD = NEW. So something like

KEi = PEs + Wf

Where KEi is the initial KE, PEs is the spring PE, Wf is the work done by friction. Use the appropriate expressions for the terms.

Write the second equation for when the block has returned to the starting point from the fully compressed position. For that portion of the trip the initial energy was all stored in the spring as PE, so that's your "OLD" part of the balance. Where's all the "NEW" energy at the end of the trip?

So the first equation would be:
0.5mv^2 = 0.5kx^2 - (µ*nc*x)
(work has to be negative as energy goes out of the system right?)

the second equation would be:
0.5kx^2 = (µ*nc*x)
There is no kinetic energy in the final position as object comes to rest.

Is this correct?
 
uzman1243 said:
So the first equation would be:
0.5mv^2 = 0.5kx^2 - (µ*nc*x)
(work has to be negative as energy goes out of the system right?)

the second equation would be:
0.5kx^2 = (µ*nc*x)
There is no kinetic energy in the final position as object comes to rest.

Is this correct?

Yup, looks good.

[edit: see my correction below]
 
Last edited:
gneill said:
Yup, looks good.

Thank you so much. You're a good man
 
  • #10
uzman1243 said:
So the first equation would be:
0.5mv^2 = 0.5kx^2 - (µ*nc*x)
(work has to be negative as energy goes out of the system right?)

Oops. Let's me correct what I said! Interchange the positions of the KE and spring PE in your equation (or equivalently, change the sign of the friction energy). When the block comes to rest at the instant the spring is fully compressed, all the remaining energy will be in the spring. So the sum of the spring energy and the friction energy should total to the original energy.

(Clearly I need another coffee this morning!)
 
  • #11
gneill said:
Oops. Let's me correct what I said! Interchange the positions of the KE and spring PE in your equation (or equivalently, change the sign of the friction energy). When the block comes to rest at the instant the spring is fully compressed, all the remaining energy will be in the spring. So the sum of the spring energy and the friction energy should total to the original energy.

(Clearly I need another coffee this morning!)

0.5mv^2 - (µ*nc*x) = 0.5kx^2

Is that correct?
 
  • #12
uzman1243 said:
0.5mv^2 - (µ*nc*x) = 0.5kx^2

Is that correct?

Yup. That's good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K