Finding the 10 lowest energy levels

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the 10 lowest energy levels in a quantum mechanics context, specifically related to the quantum numbers and their corresponding energy levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the best approach to solve the problem and questions the validity of their reasoning regarding the energy levels. Participants suggest coding as a method to calculate and order the energy levels based on quantum numbers.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring coding solutions to compute the energy levels, with some guidance offered on how to start coding in Python. The original poster expresses intent to attempt coding and has also used Excel to compute results, indicating a mix of approaches being considered.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of coding experience and the possibility of using Python, as well as the original poster's use of Excel to compute energy levels, which may indicate varying levels of familiarity with programming and computational methods.

Mason Smith
Messages
21
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


upload_2019-1-23_20-1-3.png


Homework Equations


upload_2019-1-23_20-1-30.png


The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2019-1-23_20-1-58.png

I understand the equation, and I understand the concept. My question is this: What is the best way to go about solving this problem? My line of reasoning concludes that the fourth lowest energy level is E211. However, the fourth lowest energy level is E113. Is there a code that I could write that would show the result of trying every integer for the three quantum numbers?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-23_20-1-3.png
    upload_2019-1-23_20-1-3.png
    10.1 KB · Views: 622
  • upload_2019-1-23_20-1-30.png
    upload_2019-1-23_20-1-30.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 638
  • upload_2019-1-23_20-1-58.png
    upload_2019-1-23_20-1-58.png
    10.5 KB · Views: 795
Physics news on Phys.org
You could certainly write a code to do this. You could just calculate the energy for, say n1, n2, n3 <10, then order them from lowest to highest. Do you have any coding experience? If not, this would be a good learning project. I would recommend Python for doing this. This site has a good online tutorial for learning Python.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mason Smith
phyzguy said:
You could certainly write a code to do this. You could just calculate the energy for, say n1, n2, n3 <10, then order them from lowest to highest. Do you have any coding experience? If not, this would be a good learning project. I would recommend Python for doing this. This site has a good online tutorial for learning Python.
I have some coding experience with Python. I will be sure to look at the site that you mentioned. Thank you for the suggestion! How would you recommend starting the code?
 
Mason Smith said:
I have some coding experience with Python. I will be sure to look at the site that you mentioned. Thank you for the suggestion! How would you recommend starting the code?

This is pretty simple code. Rather than me writing it for you, I suggest you make an attempt, post it here (use the code tags - see the + sign above and the example below) and we will critique it for you.

Python:
print("Hello world")
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Mason Smith
phyzguy said:
This is pretty simple code. Rather than me writing it for you, I suggest you make an attempt, post it here (use the code tags - see the + sign above and the example below) and we will critique it for you.

Python:
print("Hello world")
Alright. That sounds fair. I think that I will attempt the code this weekend, but in the meantime, I made a list of numbers in Microsoft Excel, then computed the 10 lowest energy levels (i.e., the 10 least multiples of E0). It provided the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K