Finding the absolute error for equation of total resistance

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 2K views
AdrianMachin
Messages
40
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Prove the equation for ΔRC. (See the first attachment with the circuit schematic inside)

Homework Equations


(The equation for RC, in both attachments)

The Attempt at a Solution


You can see my attempt at a solution in the second attachment. I'm stuck at the step shown in the picture. Maybe that needs a bit algebra, or my attempt was incorrect.
 

Attachments

  • 111.png
    111.png
    10.3 KB · Views: 553
  • 222.png
    222.png
    11.4 KB · Views: 475
Physics news on Phys.org
I already have difficulty with the first step: If ##R_C = R_{//} + R_3 ## then it certainly is not so that ##\log R_C = \log R_{//} + \log R_3 ## !
And then the ##\Rightarrow## is also unjustified.

I suggest you try to find ##\Delta R_{//}## on its own...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdrianMachin
ln(a+b) and ln(a) + ln(b) are not the same (first -> second line and also within the second line) and the result is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdrianMachin
BvU said:
I already have difficulty with the first step: If ##R_C = R_{//} + R_3 ## then it certainly is not so that ##\log R_C = \log R_{//} + \log R_3 ## !
And then the ##\Rightarrow## is also unjustified.

I suggest you try to find ##\Delta R_{//}## on its own...
Thanks a lot, dear BvU! I tried your suggestion and it worked! :smile:
Yes, I had a big mistake in my first attempt as you mentioned.

What do you mean by this:
And then the ##\Rightarrow## is also unjustified.
Is that because of my mistake in taking logarithms or it's generally not considered right to use in these equations?
 
Transition from first line in attachment to second line was in error.
The transition from before the ##\Rightarrow## to after was also in error, hence my remark.
$$\ln{R_1 R_2\over R_1+R_2} =\ln R_1+\ln R_2-\ln(R_1+R_2) $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdrianMachin