Finding the Absolute Maximum for a Multivariable Function Without an Interval

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the absolute maximum of the multivariable function g(x,y)=3xe^y - x^3 - e^(3y) without defined intervals. The local maximum identified at (1, 0) is not the absolute maximum, as the absence of boundary values complicates the determination of global extrema. Participants emphasize evaluating critical points where the gradient is zero and noting that without boundaries, the function may not have a global maximum. The conclusion drawn is that as x approaches negative infinity, g(x,0) tends to infinity, indicating no absolute maximum exists. Graphical analysis confirmed this understanding, leading to the resolution of the problem.
memish
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I found the local maximum for the equation g(x,y)=3xe^y - x^3 - e^(3y), which is (1, 0)...now I am supposed to show that this is not the absolute maximum for g(x,y). I don't know how to find an absolute maximum without an interval! Could anyonw shed some light on this?


Homework Equations


I have solved for the partial derivatives with respect to x, y, xx, yy, and xy (all needed to find the local max).


The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know where to go from here, all I think we have learned is the extreme value theorem where you compare the critical points to the boundary values, but I am not given any boundary values, just that x and y are continuous for all values.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is no boundary, then there may not be a max or min. But if they are, then they occur where the gradient is 0.

Find all points at which [/itex]\nabla g= \vec{0}[/itex] and evaluate them. The largest of those values is the "global maximum" which, I think, is what you are calling the "absolute maximum". In this case the second derivatives are not needed since it does not matter whether they are local maxima or not.
 
But the question was showing the point was not an absolute max. All that is necessary is to show for some (x,y) the function gets greater. Given that the function is

g(x,y)=3xey - x3 - e(3y)

one can readily see that limit as x --> -oo of g(x,0) = oo so there is no global max.
 
thanks LCKurtz, that's what i ended up doing..i graphed it on my computer and then figured that out :))
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K