Finding the Absolute Maximum for a Multivariable Function Without an Interval

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the absolute maximum of the multivariable function g(x,y) = 3xe^y - x^3 - e^(3y) without defined intervals. The original poster has identified a local maximum at (1, 0) but is uncertain about demonstrating that it is not the absolute maximum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of not having boundary values and the conditions under which maxima or minima may exist. There is mention of evaluating critical points where the gradient is zero and considering limits to assess the behavior of the function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of maxima in the absence of boundaries, suggesting that the function may not have a global maximum. Others have shared personal approaches, such as graphing the function to explore its behavior further.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that they are working under the assumption that x and y are continuous for all values, which raises questions about the applicability of the extreme value theorem in this context.

memish
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I found the local maximum for the equation g(x,y)=3xe^y - x^3 - e^(3y), which is (1, 0)...now I am supposed to show that this is not the absolute maximum for g(x,y). I don't know how to find an absolute maximum without an interval! Could anyonw shed some light on this?


Homework Equations


I have solved for the partial derivatives with respect to x, y, xx, yy, and xy (all needed to find the local max).


The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know where to go from here, all I think we have learned is the extreme value theorem where you compare the critical points to the boundary values, but I am not given any boundary values, just that x and y are continuous for all values.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is no boundary, then there may not be a max or min. But if they are, then they occur where the gradient is 0.

Find all points at which [/itex]\nabla g= \vec{0}[/itex] and evaluate them. The largest of those values is the "global maximum" which, I think, is what you are calling the "absolute maximum". In this case the second derivatives are not needed since it does not matter whether they are local maxima or not.
 
But the question was showing the point was not an absolute max. All that is necessary is to show for some (x,y) the function gets greater. Given that the function is

g(x,y)=3xey - x3 - e(3y)

one can readily see that limit as x --> -oo of g(x,0) = oo so there is no global max.
 
thanks LCKurtz, that's what i ended up doing..i graphed it on my computer and then figured that out :))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K