Finding the bound charge in a dielectric ATTEMPT 2

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 6K views
xophergrunge
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The space between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor is filled with a dielectric material whose dielectric constant ϵr varies linearly from 1 at the bottom plate (x=0) to 2 at the top plate (x=d). The capacitor is connected to a battery of voltage V. Find all the bound charge, and check that the total is zero. 2. Homework Equations

[itex]C=\frac{Q}{V}[/itex]

[itex]C=\frac{Aε_{0}}{d}[/itex]

[itex]D=ϵE[/itex]

[itex]D=ε_{0}E+P[/itex]

[itex]\int D\bullet da = Q_{f}[/itex]

[itex]σ_{b}=P⋅\widehat{n}[/itex]

[itex]ρ_{b}=−∇⋅P[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



First I found [itex]ε_{r}[/itex] as a function of x, [itex]ε_{r}=\frac{x}{d}+1[/itex].
Assuming that the area of each plate is A, I said that the bound charge must be [itex]Q_b=A(\sigma_b+\int\rho_{b}dx)[/itex].
Next, using [itex]D=ε_{0}E+P[/itex] and [itex]D=εE[/itex] I get that [itex]P=D(\frac{x}{x+d})[/itex].
Using [itex]\int D\bullet da = Q_{f}[/itex] I get that [itex]D=\frac{Q_{f}}{A}[/itex].
Nowing using [itex]σ_{b}=P⋅\widehat{n}[/itex] and [itex]ρ_{b}=−∇⋅P[/itex] I get that [itex]\sigma_b=0[/itex] at x=0, [itex]\sigma_b=-\frac{Q_f}{2A}[/itex] at x=d and [itex]\rho_b=\frac{Q_f}{A}\frac{x}{(x+d)^2}[/itex].
I integrate [itex]\rho_b[/itex] from 0 to d and I get [itex]\frac{Q_f}{A}(\ln 2 -\frac{1}{2})[/itex].
So, now plugging those values into [itex]Q_b=A(\sigma_b+\int\rho_{b}dx)[/itex] I get [itex]Q_f(\ln 2 -1)[/itex], which only equals zero when there is no free charge on the plates of the capacitor, so I know I am doing something wrong. I am pretty sure I am going about this completely wrong, but I don't see any other way to do it. Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you.

Also, using [itex]C=\frac{Q}{V}[/itex], [itex]C=\frac{Aε_{0}}{d}[/itex], and [itex]D=ϵE[/itex] I can get the capacitance [itex]C=\frac{A\epsilon_0}{d\ln 2}[/itex] and [itex]Q_f=\frac{A\epsilon_{0}V}{d\ln 2}[/itex] but I don't see how that will help me find the bound charge.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
xophergrunge said:
I get that [itex]P=D(\frac{x}{x+d})[/itex].
[itex]D=\frac{Q_{f}}{A}[/itex].

I think that's correct.

I get that [itex]\sigma_b=0[/itex] at x=0, [itex]\sigma_b=-\frac{Q_f}{2A}[/itex] at x=d
Should ##\sigma_b## have a negative sign at x = d? I guess it depends on your sign conventions and which plate is positively charged.

and [itex]\rho_b=\frac{Q_f}{A}\frac{x}{(x+d)^2}[/itex].

I don't agree with the numerator ##x## in this expression.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I get negative because [itex]\hat{n}=-\hat{i}[/itex] since x is increasing as you move from the first plate (x=0) to the second (x=d).

I just re-did my calculation for [itex]\rho_b[/itex] and I got d in the numerator now, and the whole thing has a negative sign. This will change my [itex]\int \rho_b dx[/itex] and hopefully give me an answer that makes sense. Is that what you got?

Thanks.
 
Yes, I got ##d## in the numerator instead of ##x##. I got positive for ##\sigma_b## at ##x = d## and I got ##\rho_b## to be negative. I assumed the lower plate (x = 0) is the positively charged plate so that D, E, and P all point in the positive x direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Great, I am getting that [itex]Q_b=0[/itex] now, with the bound volume charge equal to negative one half and the bound surface charge to be negative one half. Thank you so much.
 
Sorry, that was a typo. Only the volume bound charge was meant to be negative.
 
And I meant one half [itex]Q_f[/itex] for both cases.
 
And I realized my mistake with the negative sign on [itex]\sigma_b[/itex], I was thinking of the surface of the plate rather than the surface of the dielectric.