Finding the bound charge in a dielectric ATTEMPT 2

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 6K views
xophergrunge
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The space between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor is filled with a dielectric material whose dielectric constant ϵr varies linearly from 1 at the bottom plate (x=0) to 2 at the top plate (x=d). The capacitor is connected to a battery of voltage V. Find all the bound charge, and check that the total is zero. 2. Homework Equations

[itex]C=\frac{Q}{V}[/itex]

[itex]C=\frac{Aε_{0}}{d}[/itex]

[itex]D=ϵE[/itex]

[itex]D=ε_{0}E+P[/itex]

[itex]\int D\bullet da = Q_{f}[/itex]

[itex]σ_{b}=P⋅\widehat{n}[/itex]

[itex]ρ_{b}=−∇⋅P[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



First I found [itex]ε_{r}[/itex] as a function of x, [itex]ε_{r}=\frac{x}{d}+1[/itex].
Assuming that the area of each plate is A, I said that the bound charge must be [itex]Q_b=A(\sigma_b+\int\rho_{b}dx)[/itex].
Next, using [itex]D=ε_{0}E+P[/itex] and [itex]D=εE[/itex] I get that [itex]P=D(\frac{x}{x+d})[/itex].
Using [itex]\int D\bullet da = Q_{f}[/itex] I get that [itex]D=\frac{Q_{f}}{A}[/itex].
Nowing using [itex]σ_{b}=P⋅\widehat{n}[/itex] and [itex]ρ_{b}=−∇⋅P[/itex] I get that [itex]\sigma_b=0[/itex] at x=0, [itex]\sigma_b=-\frac{Q_f}{2A}[/itex] at x=d and [itex]\rho_b=\frac{Q_f}{A}\frac{x}{(x+d)^2}[/itex].
I integrate [itex]\rho_b[/itex] from 0 to d and I get [itex]\frac{Q_f}{A}(\ln 2 -\frac{1}{2})[/itex].
So, now plugging those values into [itex]Q_b=A(\sigma_b+\int\rho_{b}dx)[/itex] I get [itex]Q_f(\ln 2 -1)[/itex], which only equals zero when there is no free charge on the plates of the capacitor, so I know I am doing something wrong. I am pretty sure I am going about this completely wrong, but I don't see any other way to do it. Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you.

Also, using [itex]C=\frac{Q}{V}[/itex], [itex]C=\frac{Aε_{0}}{d}[/itex], and [itex]D=ϵE[/itex] I can get the capacitance [itex]C=\frac{A\epsilon_0}{d\ln 2}[/itex] and [itex]Q_f=\frac{A\epsilon_{0}V}{d\ln 2}[/itex] but I don't see how that will help me find the bound charge.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
xophergrunge said:
I get that [itex]P=D(\frac{x}{x+d})[/itex].
[itex]D=\frac{Q_{f}}{A}[/itex].

I think that's correct.

I get that [itex]\sigma_b=0[/itex] at x=0, [itex]\sigma_b=-\frac{Q_f}{2A}[/itex] at x=d
Should ##\sigma_b## have a negative sign at x = d? I guess it depends on your sign conventions and which plate is positively charged.

and [itex]\rho_b=\frac{Q_f}{A}\frac{x}{(x+d)^2}[/itex].

I don't agree with the numerator ##x## in this expression.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I get negative because [itex]\hat{n}=-\hat{i}[/itex] since x is increasing as you move from the first plate (x=0) to the second (x=d).

I just re-did my calculation for [itex]\rho_b[/itex] and I got d in the numerator now, and the whole thing has a negative sign. This will change my [itex]\int \rho_b dx[/itex] and hopefully give me an answer that makes sense. Is that what you got?

Thanks.
 
Yes, I got ##d## in the numerator instead of ##x##. I got positive for ##\sigma_b## at ##x = d## and I got ##\rho_b## to be negative. I assumed the lower plate (x = 0) is the positively charged plate so that D, E, and P all point in the positive x direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Great, I am getting that [itex]Q_b=0[/itex] now, with the bound volume charge equal to negative one half and the bound surface charge to be negative one half. Thank you so much.
 
OK, but how do two negative quantities add to zero?
 
Sorry, that was a typo. Only the volume bound charge was meant to be negative.
 
And I meant one half [itex]Q_f[/itex] for both cases.
 
And I realized my mistake with the negative sign on [itex]\sigma_b[/itex], I was thinking of the surface of the plate rather than the surface of the dielectric.
 
Great. Good work.